Zum kenntnisstand von patienten über die aufgaben der anästhesiologie

Translated title of the contribution: Current level of patients' knowledge of anaesthesiology

M. Bauer, J. Scholz, S. Marz, C. Spies, H. Wulf, J. Boldt, F. K. Pühringer, H. Laubenthal, E. F. Kochs

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

5 Scopus citations

Abstract

The anaesthesiologist's competence in anaesthesia, intensive care medicine, pain therapy and emergency medicine is accepted throughout the medical society. Nevertheless, during the last decades patient surveys demonstrated a considerable lack of information of the responsibility of our work. By continuous education and information anaesthesiologists have aimed to improve the information and decision-making process for the patient. This multicentre trial was designed to investigate the current public view on our profession in seven German hospitals. In-hospital patients were asked to fill out a standardised questionnaire prior to the anaesthesia premedication visit and a total of 692 questionnaires (77%) were analysed. Results demonstrated an increased level of knowledge for anaesthesia (>95%), intensive care medicine (74%), and pain therapy (50% acute pain; 32% severe pain). In the case of emergency medicine (10%) the in-hospital and out-of-hospital responsibilities were not clear among patients. We conclude that the continuous distribution of information in recent years has contributed to improving patients' knowledge on interdisciplinary responsibilities. Future efforts should focus on the gaps in patient's knowledge to allow the patient to ask the right questions necessary for decision-making.

Translated title of the contributionCurrent level of patients' knowledge of anaesthesiology
Original languageGerman
Pages (from-to)892-898
Number of pages7
JournalAnaesthesist
Volume55
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 2006

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Current level of patients' knowledge of anaesthesiology'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this