Why the European Commission is not the “unexpected winner” of the Euro Crisis: A Comment on Bauer and Becker

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

21 Scopus citations

Abstract

The protracted euro area crisis has led to a resurgence of academic interest in integration theories. In a recent piece in this journal, Bauer and Becker argue that the euro crisis allowed the European Commission to strengthen its role in economic governance, in particular with regard to its implementation powers. Contrary to Bauer and Becker’s claim, I contend that the euro crisis has resulted not in strengthening the Commission. Rather, the Commission is undergoing “subtle disempowerment”, that is, a gradual transfer of decision-making authority and resources from the Commission to the intergovernmental level and to the European Central Bank. I illustrate the Commission's subtle disempowerment along three dimensions: the creation of the intergovernmental European Stability Mechanism; enhanced oversight mechanisms of the Commission via the troika constellation; and the creation of the European System of Financial Supervision, Banking Union and Single Supervisory Mechanism under the aegis of the European Central Bank.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)95-100
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of European Integration
Volume38
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 2 Jan 2016
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Euro crisis
  • European Central Bank
  • European Commission
  • theories of European integration

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Why the European Commission is not the “unexpected winner” of the Euro Crisis: A Comment on Bauer and Becker'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this