Who can escape the natural number bias in rational number tasks? A study involving students and experts

Andreas Obersteiner, Jo Van Hoof, Lieven Verschaffel, Wim Van Dooren

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

27 Scopus citations

Abstract

Many learners have difficulties with rational number tasks because they persistently rely on their natural number knowledge, which is not always applicable. Studies show that such a natural number bias can mislead not only children but also educated adults. It is still unclear whether and under what conditions mathematical expertise enables people to be completely unaffected by such a bias on tasks in which people with less expertise are clearly biased. We compared the performance of eighth-grade students and expert mathematicians on the same set of algebraic expression problems that addressed the effect of arithmetic operations (multiplication and division). Using accuracy and response time measures, we found clear evidence for a natural number bias in students but no traces of a bias in experts. The data suggested that whereas students based their answers on their intuitions about natural numbers, expert mathematicians relied on their skilled intuitions about algebraic expressions. We conclude that it is possible for experts to be unaffected by the natural number bias on rational number tasks when they use strategies that do not involve natural numbers.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)537-555
Number of pages19
JournalBritish Journal of Psychology
Volume107
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Aug 2016

Keywords

  • algebraic inequalities
  • effect of arithmetic operations
  • rational numbers
  • whole number bias

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Who can escape the natural number bias in rational number tasks? A study involving students and experts'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this