TY - GEN
T1 - Where do we stand in requirements engineering improvement today?
T2 - 8th ACM/IEEE International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement, ESEM 2014
AU - Fernández, Daniel Méndez
AU - Ognawala, Saahil
AU - Wagner, Stefan
AU - Daneva, Maya
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2014 ACM.
PY - 2014/9/18
Y1 - 2014/9/18
N2 - Context: Requirements engineering process improvement (REPI) approaches have gained much attention in research and practice. Goal: So far, there is no comprehensive view on the research in REPI in terms of solutions and current state of reported evidence. We aims to provide an overview on the existing solutions, their underlying principles and their research type facets, i.e. their state of empirical evidence. Method: To this end, we conducted a systematic mapping study of the REPI publication space. Results: This paper reports on the first findings regarding research type facets of the contributions as well as selected methodological principles. We found a strong focus in the existing research on solution proposals for REPI approaches that concentrate on normative assessments and benchmarks of the RE activities rather than on holistic RE improvements according to individual goals of companies. Conclusions: We conclude, so far, that there is a need to broaden the work and to investigate more problem-driven REPI which also targets the improvement of the quality of the underlying RE artefacts, which currently seem out of scope.
AB - Context: Requirements engineering process improvement (REPI) approaches have gained much attention in research and practice. Goal: So far, there is no comprehensive view on the research in REPI in terms of solutions and current state of reported evidence. We aims to provide an overview on the existing solutions, their underlying principles and their research type facets, i.e. their state of empirical evidence. Method: To this end, we conducted a systematic mapping study of the REPI publication space. Results: This paper reports on the first findings regarding research type facets of the contributions as well as selected methodological principles. We found a strong focus in the existing research on solution proposals for REPI approaches that concentrate on normative assessments and benchmarks of the RE activities rather than on holistic RE improvements according to individual goals of companies. Conclusions: We conclude, so far, that there is a need to broaden the work and to investigate more problem-driven REPI which also targets the improvement of the quality of the underlying RE artefacts, which currently seem out of scope.
KW - requirements engineering
KW - software process improvement
KW - systematic mapping study
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84907815631&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1145/2652524.2652555
DO - 10.1145/2652524.2652555
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:84907815631
T3 - International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement
BT - International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement
PB - IEEE Computer Society
Y2 - 18 September 2014 through 19 September 2014
ER -