TY - JOUR
T1 - What is successful prototyping? Insights from novice designers’ self-evaluation of prototyping success
AU - Hansen, Camilla Arndt
AU - Martins Pacheco, Nuno Miguel
AU - Özkil, Ali Gürcan
AU - Zimmermann, Markus
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© ICED 2021.All right reserved.
PY - 2021
Y1 - 2021
N2 - Prototyping is essential for fuzzy front-end product development. The prototyping process answers questions about critical assumptions and supports design decisions, but it is often unstructured and context-dependent. Previously, we showed how to guide novice designers in early development stages with prototyping milestones. Here, we studied the prototyping success perceived by novice design teams. This was done in two steps: (1) teams were asked to assign each prototype to a milestone, a specific purpose, a fidelity level, and a human-centered design lens, and then evaluate the success using a predefined set of criteria. (2) Teams were interviewed about the success of the prototyping process, this time using self-chosen criteria. Results related to (1) show that teams perceived prototyping activities with respect to desirability and problem validation significantly less successful than prototyping activities towards feasibility and solution validation. Results related to (2) show that teams mostly chose success criteria related to how well prototypes supported communication, decision making, learning, and tangibility. This insight may be used to give priorities to further improvement of methods and guidance in these areas.
AB - Prototyping is essential for fuzzy front-end product development. The prototyping process answers questions about critical assumptions and supports design decisions, but it is often unstructured and context-dependent. Previously, we showed how to guide novice designers in early development stages with prototyping milestones. Here, we studied the prototyping success perceived by novice design teams. This was done in two steps: (1) teams were asked to assign each prototype to a milestone, a specific purpose, a fidelity level, and a human-centered design lens, and then evaluate the success using a predefined set of criteria. (2) Teams were interviewed about the success of the prototyping process, this time using self-chosen criteria. Results related to (1) show that teams perceived prototyping activities with respect to desirability and problem validation significantly less successful than prototyping activities towards feasibility and solution validation. Results related to (2) show that teams mostly chose success criteria related to how well prototypes supported communication, decision making, learning, and tangibility. This insight may be used to give priorities to further improvement of methods and guidance in these areas.
KW - Design process
KW - Education
KW - Evaluation
KW - New product development
KW - Prototyping
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85117746765&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1017/pds.2021.604
DO - 10.1017/pds.2021.604
M3 - Conference article
AN - SCOPUS:85117746765
SN - 2732-527X
VL - 1
SP - 3431
EP - 3440
JO - Proceedings of the Design Society
JF - Proceedings of the Design Society
T2 - 23rd International Conference on Engineering Design, ICED 2021
Y2 - 16 August 2021 through 20 August 2021
ER -