Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Visualizing dynamics of charges and strings in (2 + 1)D lattice gauge theories

  • T. A. Cochran
  • , B. Jobst
  • , E. Rosenberg
  • , Y. D. Lensky
  • , G. Gyawali
  • , N. Eassa
  • , M. Will
  • , A. Szasz
  • , D. Abanin
  • , R. Acharya
  • , L. Aghababaie Beni
  • , T. I. Andersen
  • , M. Ansmann
  • , F. Arute
  • , K. Arya
  • , A. Asfaw
  • , J. Atalaya
  • , R. Babbush
  • , B. Ballard
  • , J. C. Bardin
  • A. Bengtsson, A. Bilmes, A. Bourassa, J. Bovaird, M. Broughton, D. A. Browne, B. Buchea, B. B. Buckley, T. Burger, B. Burkett, N. Bushnell, A. Cabrera, J. Campero, H. S. Chang, Z. Chen, B. Chiaro, J. Claes, A. Y. Cleland, J. Cogan, R. Collins, P. Conner, W. Courtney, A. L. Crook, B. Curtin, S. Das, S. Demura, L. De Lorenzo, A. Di Paolo, P. Donohoe, I. Drozdov, A. Dunsworth, A. Eickbusch, A. Moshe Elbag, M. Elzouka, C. Erickson, V. S. Ferreira, L. Flores Burgos, E. Forati, A. G. Fowler, B. Foxen, S. Ganjam, R. Gasca, Genois, W. Giang, D. Gilboa, R. Gosula, A. Grajales Dau, D. Graumann, A. Greene, J. A. Gross, S. Habegger, M. Hansen, M. P. Harrigan, S. D. Harrington, P. Heu, O. Higgott, J. Hilton, H. Y. Huang, A. Huff, W. Huggins, E. Jeffrey, Z. Jiang, C. Jones, C. Joshi, P. Juhas, D. Kafri, H. Kang, A. H. Karamlou, K. Kechedzhi, T. Khaire, T. Khattar, M. Khezri, S. Kim, P. Klimov, B. Kobrin, A. Korotkov, F. Kostritsa, J. Kreikebaum, V. Kurilovich, D. Landhuis, T. Lange-Dei, B. Langley, K. M. Lau, J. Ledford, K. Lee, B. Lester, L. Le Guevel, W. Li, A. T. Lill, W. Livingston, A. Locharla, D. Lundahl, A. Lunt, S. Madhuk, A. Maloney, S. Mandrà, L. Martin, O. Martin, C. Maxfield, J. McClean, M. McEwen, S. Meeks, A. Megrant, K. Miao, R. Molavi, S. Molina, S. Montazeri, R. Movassagh, C. Neill, M. Newman, A. Nguyen, M. Nguyen, C. H. Ni, K. Ottosson, A. Pizzuto, R. Potter, O. Pritchard, C. Quintana, G. Ramachandran, M. Reagor, D. Rhodes, G. Roberts, K. Sankaragomathi, K. Satzinger, H. Schurkus, M. Shearn, A. Shorter, N. Shutty, V. Shvarts, V. Sivak, S. Small, W. C. Smith, S. Springer, G. Sterling, J. Suchard, A. Sztein, D. Thor, M. Torunbalci, A. Vaishnav, J. Vargas, S. Vdovichev, G. Vidal, C. Vollgraff Heidweiller, S. Waltman, S. X. Wang, B. Ware, T. White, K. Wong, B. W.K. Woo, C. Xing, Z. Jamie Yao, P. Yeh, B. Ying, J. Yoo, N. Yosri, G. Young, A. Zalcman, Y. Zhang, N. Zhu, N. Zobrist, S. Boixo, J. Kelly, E. Lucero, Y. Chen, V. Smelyanskiy, H. Neven, A. Gammon-Smith, F. Pollmann, M. Knap, P. Roushan
  • Google Inc
  • Princeton University
  • Technical University of Munich
  • Munich Center for Quantum Science and Technology (MCQST)
  • Cornell University College of Engineering
  • Cornell University Laboratory of Atomic and Solid State Physics
  • Purdue University
  • University of Massachusetts
  • University of Connecticut
  • University of California
  • University of Nottingham

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

28 Scopus citations

Abstract

Lattice gauge theories (LGTs)1, 2, 3–4 can be used to understand a wide range of phenomena, from elementary particle scattering in high-energy physics to effective descriptions of many-body interactions in materials5, 6–7. Studying dynamical properties of emergent phases can be challenging, as it requires solving many-body problems that are generally beyond perturbative limits8, 9–10. Here we investigate the dynamics of local excitations in a Z2 LGT using a two-dimensional lattice of superconducting qubits. We first construct a simple variational circuit that prepares low-energy states that have a large overlap with the ground state; then we create charge excitations with local gates and simulate their quantum dynamics by means of a discretized time evolution. As the electric field coupling constant is increased, our measurements show signatures of transitioning from deconfined to confined dynamics. For confined excitations, the electric field induces a tension in the string connecting them. Our method allows us to experimentally image string dynamics in a (2+1)D LGT, from which we uncover two distinct regimes inside the confining phase: for weak confinement, the string fluctuates strongly in the transverse direction, whereas for strong confinement, transverse fluctuations are effectively frozen11,12. We also demonstrate a resonance condition at which dynamical string breaking is facilitated. Our LGT implementation on a quantum processor presents a new set of techniques for investigating emergent excitations and string dynamics.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)315-320
Number of pages6
JournalNature
Volume642
Issue number8067
DOIs
StatePublished - 12 Jun 2025

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Visualizing dynamics of charges and strings in (2 + 1)D lattice gauge theories'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this