TY - GEN
T1 - Video quality evaluation in the cloud
AU - Keimel, Christian
AU - Habigt, Julian
AU - Horch, Clemens
AU - Diepold, Klaus
PY - 2012
Y1 - 2012
N2 - Video quality evaluation with subjective testing is both time consuming and expensive. An interesting new approach to traditional testing is the so-called crowdsourcing, moving the testing effort into the internet. The QualityCrowd framework allows codec independent, crowd-based video quality assessment with a simple web interface, usable with common web browsers. However, due to its codec independent approach, the framework can pose high bandwidth requirements on the coordinating server. We therefore propose in this contribution a cloud-based extension of the QualityCrowd framework in order to perform subjective quality evaluation as a cloud application. Moreover, this allows us to access an even larger pool of potential participants due to the improved connectivity. We compare the results from an online subjective test using this framework with the results from a test in a standardized environment. This comparison shows that QualityCrowd delivers equivalent results within the acceptable inter-lab correlation.
AB - Video quality evaluation with subjective testing is both time consuming and expensive. An interesting new approach to traditional testing is the so-called crowdsourcing, moving the testing effort into the internet. The QualityCrowd framework allows codec independent, crowd-based video quality assessment with a simple web interface, usable with common web browsers. However, due to its codec independent approach, the framework can pose high bandwidth requirements on the coordinating server. We therefore propose in this contribution a cloud-based extension of the QualityCrowd framework in order to perform subjective quality evaluation as a cloud application. Moreover, this allows us to access an even larger pool of potential participants due to the improved connectivity. We compare the results from an online subjective test using this framework with the results from a test in a standardized environment. This comparison shows that QualityCrowd delivers equivalent results within the acceptable inter-lab correlation.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/84864521527
U2 - 10.1109/PV.2012.6229729
DO - 10.1109/PV.2012.6229729
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:84864521527
SN - 9781467303019
T3 - 2012 19th International Packet Video Workshop, PV 2012
SP - 155
EP - 160
BT - 2012 19th International Packet Video Workshop, PV 2012
T2 - 2012 19th International Packet Video Workshop, PV 2012
Y2 - 10 May 2012 through 11 May 2012
ER -