Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Venous resection during pancreatectomy for pancreatic cancer: A systematic review

  • Technical University of Munich
  • Acibadem Mehmet Ali Aydinlar University

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

26 Scopus citations

Abstract

Pancreatic cancer is one of the most aggressive and lethal malignancies with a dismal prognosis and survival. The curative effects of venous resection (VR) in pancreatic cancer remain controversial. A systematic literature search was performed in PubMed, Embase and the Cochrane Library. The overall postoperative complications, perioperative mortality, histopathology, and long-term survival were compared between patients undergoing pancreatectomy combined with (VR+ group) or without (VR− group) VR. Forty-one studies were included in the systematic review. Pancreatectomy combined with VR required longer operation time and led to increased perioperative blood loss, whereas postoperative complications were similar. Patients in the VR+ group showed larger tumors and reduced R0 rates. Regarding long-term survival, patients with VR+ seemed to have impaired 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival. Based on our results, VR in pancreatic cancer is a safe and feasible procedure. Given the fact that patients have miserable outcomes and survival in the palliative setting alone, extended resection including VR is required for the purpose of achieving radical resection.

Original languageEnglish
JournalTranslational Gastroenterology and Hepatology
Volume4
Issue numberJune
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2019

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • Pancreatectomy
  • Pancreatic cancer
  • Systematic review
  • Venous resection (VR)

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Venous resection during pancreatectomy for pancreatic cancer: A systematic review'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this