TY - JOUR
T1 - Venous and arterial reflex responses to positive-pressure breathing and lower body negative pressure
AU - Peters, Jochen K.
AU - Lister, George
AU - Nadel, Ethan R.
AU - Mack, Gary W.
PY - 1997/6
Y1 - 1997/6
N2 - We examined the relative importance of arteriolar and venous reflex responses during reductions in cardiac output provoked by conditions that increase [positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP)] or decrease [lower body negative pressure (LBNP)] peripheral venous filling. Five healthy subjects were exposed to PEEP (10, 15, 20, and 25 cmH2O) and LBNP (-10, -15, -20, and -25 mmHg) to induce progressive but comparable reductions in right atrial transmural pressure (control to minimum): from 5.9 ± 0.4 to 1.8 ± 0.7 and from 6.5 ± 0.6 to 2.0 ± 0.2 mmHg with PEEP and LBNP, respectively. Cardiac output (impedance cardiography) fell less during PEEP than during LBNP (from 3.64 ± 0.21 to 2.81 ± 0.21 and from 3.39 ± 0.21 to 2.14 ± 0.24 1 · min- 1 · m-2 with PEEP and LBNP, respectively), and mean arterial pressure increased. We observed sustained increases in forearm vascular resistance (i.e., forearm blood flow by venous occlusion plethysmography) and systemic vascular resistance that were greater during LBNP: from 19.7 ± 2.91 to 27.97 ± 5.46 and from 20.56 ± 2.48 to 50.25 ± 5.86 mmHg · ml-1 · 100 ml tissue-1 · min (P < 0.05) during PEEP and LBNP, respectively. Venomotor responses (venous pressure in the hemodynamically isolated limb) were always transient, significant only with the greatest reduction in right atrial transmural pressure, and were similar for LBNP and PEEP. Thus arteriolar rather than venous responses are predominant in blood volume mobilization from skin and muscle, and venoconstriction is not intensified with venous engorgement during PEEP.
AB - We examined the relative importance of arteriolar and venous reflex responses during reductions in cardiac output provoked by conditions that increase [positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP)] or decrease [lower body negative pressure (LBNP)] peripheral venous filling. Five healthy subjects were exposed to PEEP (10, 15, 20, and 25 cmH2O) and LBNP (-10, -15, -20, and -25 mmHg) to induce progressive but comparable reductions in right atrial transmural pressure (control to minimum): from 5.9 ± 0.4 to 1.8 ± 0.7 and from 6.5 ± 0.6 to 2.0 ± 0.2 mmHg with PEEP and LBNP, respectively. Cardiac output (impedance cardiography) fell less during PEEP than during LBNP (from 3.64 ± 0.21 to 2.81 ± 0.21 and from 3.39 ± 0.21 to 2.14 ± 0.24 1 · min- 1 · m-2 with PEEP and LBNP, respectively), and mean arterial pressure increased. We observed sustained increases in forearm vascular resistance (i.e., forearm blood flow by venous occlusion plethysmography) and systemic vascular resistance that were greater during LBNP: from 19.7 ± 2.91 to 27.97 ± 5.46 and from 20.56 ± 2.48 to 50.25 ± 5.86 mmHg · ml-1 · 100 ml tissue-1 · min (P < 0.05) during PEEP and LBNP, respectively. Venomotor responses (venous pressure in the hemodynamically isolated limb) were always transient, significant only with the greatest reduction in right atrial transmural pressure, and were similar for LBNP and PEEP. Thus arteriolar rather than venous responses are predominant in blood volume mobilization from skin and muscle, and venoconstriction is not intensified with venous engorgement during PEEP.
KW - Central venous pressure
KW - Positive end- expiratory pressure
KW - Vasoconstriction
KW - Venomotor
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0030997407&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1152/jappl.1997.82.6.1889
DO - 10.1152/jappl.1997.82.6.1889
M3 - Article
C2 - 9173955
AN - SCOPUS:0030997407
SN - 8750-7587
VL - 82
SP - 1889
EP - 1896
JO - Journal of Applied Physiology
JF - Journal of Applied Physiology
IS - 6
ER -