TY - JOUR
T1 - Value-at-risk constrained portfolios in incomplete markets
T2 - a dynamic programming approach to Heston’s model
AU - Escobar-Anel, Marcos
AU - Havrylenko, Yevhen
AU - Zagst, Rudi
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2025.
PY - 2025
Y1 - 2025
N2 - We solve an expected utility-maximization problem with a Value-at-risk constraint on the terminal portfolio value in an incomplete financial market due to stochastic volatility. To derive the optimal investment strategy, we use the dynamic programming approach. We demonstrate that the value function in the constrained problem can be represented as the expected modified utility function of a vega-neutral financial derivative on the optimal terminal wealth in the unconstrained utility-maximization problem. Via the same financial derivative, the optimal wealth and the optimal investment strategy in the constrained problem are linked to the optimal wealth and the optimal investment strategy in the unconstrained problem. In numerical studies, we substantiate the impact of risk aversion levels and investment horizons on the optimal investment strategy. We observe a 20% relative difference between the constrained and unconstrained allocations for average parameters in a low-risk-aversion short-horizon setting.
AB - We solve an expected utility-maximization problem with a Value-at-risk constraint on the terminal portfolio value in an incomplete financial market due to stochastic volatility. To derive the optimal investment strategy, we use the dynamic programming approach. We demonstrate that the value function in the constrained problem can be represented as the expected modified utility function of a vega-neutral financial derivative on the optimal terminal wealth in the unconstrained utility-maximization problem. Via the same financial derivative, the optimal wealth and the optimal investment strategy in the constrained problem are linked to the optimal wealth and the optimal investment strategy in the unconstrained problem. In numerical studies, we substantiate the impact of risk aversion levels and investment horizons on the optimal investment strategy. We observe a 20% relative difference between the constrained and unconstrained allocations for average parameters in a low-risk-aversion short-horizon setting.
KW - Hamilton Jacobi Bellman equations
KW - Investment management
KW - Portfolio optimization
KW - Stochastic volatility
KW - Utility maximization
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85217416945&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s10479-024-06390-x
DO - 10.1007/s10479-024-06390-x
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85217416945
SN - 0254-5330
JO - Annals of Operations Research
JF - Annals of Operations Research
ER -