Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Validation of the Behavioral Activation for Depression Scale (BADS) - Psychometric properties of the long and short form

  • University of Tübingen
  • Philipps-Universität Marburg
  • Leuphana University Lüneburg

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

50 Scopus citations

Abstract

With the development of the Behavioral Activation for Depression Scale (BADS) by Kanter, et al. [1], different behavioral aspects of depression like activation, rumination or avoidance, and functional impairment can be measured. The long and the short versions of the BADS, however, show differences in the quality of psychometric properties. We wanted to validate the short and long forms of the BADS. We therefore evaluated the factor structure, the psychometric properties, and the construct validity of the long version and the subscales in a clinically depressed German sample (n = 258) in study 1. In study 2, we explored the factor structure and the psychometric properties of the short version of the BADS in a subsyndromal sample with elevated depressive symptoms (n = 406). In study 1, our results replicated the four factor solution of the BADS-25 original version and showed good psychometric properties. However, with regard to the BADS-9 only the French factor solution of the short BADS-9 demonstrated acceptable fit with low internal consistency of the subscale Avoidance. Thus, only the total score of the short form can be recommended.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)209-218
Number of pages10
JournalComprehensive Psychiatry
Volume66
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Apr 2016
Externally publishedYes

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Validation of the Behavioral Activation for Depression Scale (BADS) - Psychometric properties of the long and short form'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this