Usability evaluation on teaching and applying model-driven object oriented approaches for PLC software

Birgit Vogel-Heuser, Steven Braun, Martin Obermeier, Fabian Jobst, Karin Schweizer

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contributionpeer-review

8 Scopus citations

Abstract

In machine and plant automation, model-driven object oriented (oo) programming of Programmable Logic Controller (PLC) software is becoming an alternative to the state-of-the-art programming. The authors present the results of previously conducted experiments on the usability of the classic procedural paradigm (IEC 61131-3) compared to model-driven approaches for PLC programming, in particular Unified Modeling Language (UML) and domain specific modeling languages. Subsequently, the newest study on this issue is presented, including the experimental design and the experiment's parameters, comparing state-of-the-art FDB (IEC 61131-3) programming approach to a model-driven UML supported approach. Finally, we show the study's results and discuss our findings and their meaning for future experiments, concerning the complexity of the tasks required to develop a PLC-program, the influence of previous knowledge, and the realization of constant boundary conditions for experimental studies.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publication2012 American Control Conference, ACC 2012
PublisherInstitute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.
Pages4463-4469
Number of pages7
ISBN (Print)9781457710957
DOIs
StatePublished - 2012
Event2012 American Control Conference, ACC 2012 - Montreal, QC, Canada
Duration: 27 Jun 201229 Jun 2012

Publication series

NameProceedings of the American Control Conference
ISSN (Print)0743-1619

Conference

Conference2012 American Control Conference, ACC 2012
Country/TerritoryCanada
CityMontreal, QC
Period27/06/1229/06/12

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Usability evaluation on teaching and applying model-driven object oriented approaches for PLC software'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this