Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Updated Overall Survival by Circulating Tumor DNA Status from the Phase 3 IMvigor010 Trial: Adjuvant Atezolizumab Versus Observation in Muscle-invasive Urothelial Carcinoma

  • Thomas Powles
  • , Zoe June Assaf
  • , Viraj Degaonkar
  • , Petros Grivas
  • , Maha Hussain
  • , Stephane Oudard
  • , Jürgen E. Gschwend
  • , Peter Albers
  • , Daniel Castellano
  • , Hiroyuki Nishiyama
  • , Siamak Daneshmand
  • , Shruti Sharma
  • , Himanshu Sethi
  • , Alexey Aleshin
  • , Yi Shi
  • , Nicole Davarpanah
  • , Corey Carter
  • , Joaquim Bellmunt
  • , Sanjeev Mariathasan
  • Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry
  • Genentech, Inc
  • Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center
  • Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine
  • AP-HP
  • Medical Faculty and University Hospital Düsseldorf
  • Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre
  • Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba
  • University of Southern California
  • Natera, Inc
  • Harvard Medical School

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

126 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background: Interim results from IMvigor010 showed an overall survival (OS) benefit for adjuvant atezolizumab (anti–PD-L1) versus observation in patients with circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA)-positive muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma (MIUC). Objective: To report updated OS and safety by ctDNA status. Design, setting, and participants: This ad hoc analysis from a global, open-label, randomized, phase 3 trial (NCT02450331) included intention-to-treat (ITT) population with evaluable cycle 1 day 1 (C1D1) ctDNA samples. Intervention: Atezolizumab (1200 mg every 3 wk) or observation for ≤1 yr. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis: OS, relapse rates, and safety by ctDNA status were assessed. Results and limitations: Among 581 of 809 ITT patients included, 214 (37%) were ctDNA positive. Atezolizumab did not improve OS versus observation in ITT patients (hazard ratio [HR] 0.91 [95% confidence interval {CI} 0.73–1.13]; median follow-up 46.8 mo [interquartile range, 36.1–53.6]). In the observation arm, ctDNA positivity versus negativity was associated with shorter OS (HR 6.3 [95% CI 4.3–9.3]). The ctDNA positivity identified patients with an OS benefit favoring atezolizumab versus observation (HR 0.59 [95% CI 0.42–0.83]). A greater reduction in ctDNA levels with atezolizumab (C3D1) was associated with longer OS (100% clearance, 60.0 mo [95% CI 35.5–not estimable]; 50–99% reduction, 34.3 mo [95% CI 15.2–not estimable]; <50% reduction, 19.9 mo [95% CI 16.4–32.2]). The ctDNA positivity at C1D1 + C3D1 was associated with relapse with greater sensitivity than C1D1 alone (68% vs 57%). Adverse events were more frequent with atezolizumab than with observation, regardless of ctDNA status. A study limitation was its exploratory design. Conclusions: Evidence suggests that ctDNA positivity in MIUC predicts a benefit with atezolizumab. An in-progress prospective study will further evaluate these findings. Patient summary: Among patients with urothelial cancer after surgery, survival was poorer if tumor-derived DNA was detected in their bloodstream; these patients’ survival was longer with atezolizumab versus observation. Bloodstream tumor-derived DNA may identify patients who benefit from atezolizumab.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)114-122
Number of pages9
JournalEuropean Urology
Volume85
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 2024

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • Adjuvant
  • Anti–PD-L1
  • Atezolizumab
  • Circulating tumor DNA
  • Cystectomy
  • Immune checkpoint inhibitor
  • Muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma
  • Overall survival
  • Radical surgery
  • Relapse

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Updated Overall Survival by Circulating Tumor DNA Status from the Phase 3 IMvigor010 Trial: Adjuvant Atezolizumab Versus Observation in Muscle-invasive Urothelial Carcinoma'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this