Unterschiede in der Nährstoffzufuhr bei Verwendung verschiedener Nährstoff-Datenbanken - Ein Fallbeilspiel

Translated title of the contribution: Differences in nutrient intake when using different nutrient data bases - An example

J. Linseisen, G. Wolfram

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

5 Scopus citations

Abstract

Mean dietary intake calculated from 25 7-day-food records by means of the three nutrient data bases modified Souci/Fachmann/Kraut (mSFK) 1986/87, extract of Bundeslebensmittelschlüssel (BLS) version 2.1, and extract of BLS version 2.2 revealed comparable results only for four of 27 nutrients considered. The greatest deviations were found for zink, fluoride, iodine, vitamin D, vitamin C, and dietary fiber. Comparing the revised BLS version 2.2 and mSFK, the differences in fluoride, iodine and dietary fiber intake data were markedly lower than found with the comparison of BLS 2.1 and mSFK; statistically significant differences no longer existed for the vitamins C and A (equivalents). As expected, using the mSFK data base with some missing fields for analytical data underestimation of nutrient intake could be shown for the trace elements zink, fluoride and iodine. With regard to the given results of the investigated group, care has to be taken with some nutrient intake data gathered by means of BLS 2.1, too.

Translated title of the contributionDifferences in nutrient intake when using different nutrient data bases - An example
Original languageGerman
Pages (from-to)127-132
Number of pages6
JournalZeitschrift fur Ernahrungswissenschaft
Volume36
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 1997
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Differences in nutrient intake when using different nutrient data bases - An example'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this