Unité de doctrine – contingency of practice? Towards the re-reading of the 20th Century principles of architectural conservation-restoration

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contributionpeer-review

Abstract

The theoretical framework of building heritage conservation is not necessarily a predefined set of tenets and axioms with potentially universal significance, but a result of particular challenges and practices bound in time and place. In this article, the guidelines of building heritage conservation in Switzerland in the last century are outlined briefly with reference to the broader European theoretical discourse. Focusing on the contradictions between the theoretical position and practical work of Linus Birchler, it argues for the necessity to re-read and assess our principles of building heritage conservation in relation to the specific built cases they originated from.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationHeritage for Future
Subtitle of host publicationConservation Ethics Today: Are our conservation-restoration theories and practice ready for the 21st century?
EditorsBogusław Szmygin, Ursula Schädler-Saub
Place of PublicationLublin
PublisherLublin University of Technology
Pages153-164
Volume8
DOIs
StatePublished - 2019

Keywords

  • Building heritage conservation
  • architectural restoration
  • conservation guidelines
  • Switzerland
  • 20th century

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Unité de doctrine – contingency of practice? Towards the re-reading of the 20th Century principles of architectural conservation-restoration'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this