TY - GEN
T1 - Two new ad-hoc models of detection physics and their evaluation for navigated beta probe surface imaging
AU - Shakir, Dzhoshkun I.
AU - Hartl, Alexander
AU - Schneider, Florian R.
AU - Pulko, Jožef
AU - Ziegler, Sibylle I.
AU - Navab, Nassir
AU - Lasser, Tobias
PY - 2012
Y1 - 2012
N2 - Intra-operative surface imaging with navigated beta probes in conjunction with positron-emitting radiotracers like 18F-FDG has been shown to enable control of tumor resection borders. We showed previously that employing iterative reconstruction (MLEM) in conjunction with an ad-hoc model of the detection physics (based on solid-angle geometry, SA) improves the image quality. In this study, we sampled the beta probe readings of a point source using a precision step-motor to generate a look-up-table (LUT) model. We also generated a simplified geometrical model (SG) based on this data set. To see how these two models influence the image quality compared to the old SA model, we reconstructed images from sparsely sampled datasets of a phantom with three hotspots using each model. The images yielded 76% (SA), 81% (SG), and 81% (LUT) mean NCC compared to the ground truth. The SG and LUT models, however, could resolve the hotspots better in the datasets where the detector-to-phantom distance was larger. Additionally, we compared the deviations of the SA and SG analytical models to the measured LUT model, where we found that the SG model gives estimates substantially closer to the actual beta probe readings than the previous SA model.
AB - Intra-operative surface imaging with navigated beta probes in conjunction with positron-emitting radiotracers like 18F-FDG has been shown to enable control of tumor resection borders. We showed previously that employing iterative reconstruction (MLEM) in conjunction with an ad-hoc model of the detection physics (based on solid-angle geometry, SA) improves the image quality. In this study, we sampled the beta probe readings of a point source using a precision step-motor to generate a look-up-table (LUT) model. We also generated a simplified geometrical model (SG) based on this data set. To see how these two models influence the image quality compared to the old SA model, we reconstructed images from sparsely sampled datasets of a phantom with three hotspots using each model. The images yielded 76% (SA), 81% (SG), and 81% (LUT) mean NCC compared to the ground truth. The SG and LUT models, however, could resolve the hotspots better in the datasets where the detector-to-phantom distance was larger. Additionally, we compared the deviations of the SA and SG analytical models to the measured LUT model, where we found that the SG model gives estimates substantially closer to the actual beta probe readings than the previous SA model.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/84860245288
U2 - 10.1117/12.911456
DO - 10.1117/12.911456
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:84860245288
SN - 9780819489654
T3 - Progress in Biomedical Optics and Imaging - Proceedings of SPIE
BT - Medical Imaging 2012
T2 - Medical Imaging 2012: Image-Guided Procedures, Robotic Interventions, and Modeling
Y2 - 5 February 2012 through 7 February 2012
ER -