Trigger factor and DnaK possess overlapping substrate pools and binding specificities

  • Elke Deuerling
  • , Holger Patzelt
  • , Sonja Vorderwülbecke
  • , Thomas Rauch
  • , Günter Kramer
  • , Elke Schaffitzel
  • , Axel Mogk
  • , Agnes Schulze-Specking
  • , Hanno Langen
  • , Bernd Bukau

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

174 Scopus citations

Abstract

Ribosome-associated Trigger Factor (TF) and the DnaK chaperone system assist the folding of newly synthesized proteins in Escherichia coli. Here, we show that DnaK and TF share a common substrate pool in vivo. In TF-deficient cells, Δtig, depleted for DnaK and DnaJ the amount of aggregated proteins increases with increasing temperature, amounting to 10% of total soluble protein (approximately 340 protein species) at 37°C. A similar population of proteins aggregated in DnaK depleted tig+ cells, albeit to a much lower extent. Ninety-four aggregated proteins isolated from DnaK- and DnaJ-depleted Δtig cells were identified by mass spectrometry and found to include essential cytosolic proteins. Four potential in vivo substrates were screened for chaperone binding sites using peptide libraries. Although TF and DnaK recognize different binding motifs, 77% of TF binding peptides also associated with DnaK. In the case of the nascent polypeptides TF and DnaK competed for binding, however, with competitive advantage for TF. In vivo, the loss of TF is compensated by the induction of the heat shock response and thus enhanced levels of DnaK. In summary, our results demonstrate that the co-operation of the two mechanistically distinct chaperones in protein folding is based on their overlap in substrate specificities.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1317-1328
Number of pages12
JournalMolecular Microbiology
Volume47
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2003
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Trigger factor and DnaK possess overlapping substrate pools and binding specificities'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this