Treatment of HCC with pravastatin, octreotide, or gemcitabine - A critical evaluation

C. Lersch, R. Schmelz, J. Erdmann, R. Hollweck, E. Schulte-Frohlinde, F. Eckel, M. Nader, V. Schusdziarra

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

49 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background/Aims: New perspectives in the treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinomas have recently been inaugurated with the application of hydroxymethylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitors i.e. pravastatin, the somatostatin analogue octreotide, or the cytidine analogue gemcitabine. The present study aimed to evaluate these substances in patients with progressive tumor growth. Methodology: A total of 58 patients either received 3x200μg/day octreotide for 2 months followed by 20mg octreotide LAR every 4 weeks (n=30) or 40-80mg pravastatin (n=20) or 80-90mg/m2 gemcitabine over 24 hours weekly in cycles of 4 weeks (n=8). Kaplan-Meier survival curves and the log-rank test were used for univariate comparison of sur vival. Results: The median overall survival of patients receiving octreotide was 5 months, of patients receiving pravastatin 7.2 months and of patients receiving gemcitabine 3.5 months. The difference between the pravastatin and the gemcitabine groups was significant. No WHO grade 3 or 4 side effects were seen in either group of patients. Conclusions: These results do not confirm those of former studies. Neither pravastatin, nor octreotide, nor gemcitabine did prolong the patients' median overall survival as compared to control groups reported by other authors. New therapeutic strategies have to be found for patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinomas.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1099-1103
Number of pages5
JournalHepato-Gastroenterology
Volume51
Issue number58
StatePublished - Jul 2004

Keywords

  • Gemcitabine
  • Hepatocellular carcinoma
  • Octreotide
  • Pravastatin
  • Therapy

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Treatment of HCC with pravastatin, octreotide, or gemcitabine - A critical evaluation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this