Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Translational analysis and final efficacy of the AVETUX trial – Avelumab, cetuximab and FOLFOX in metastatic colorectal cancer

  • Joseph Tintelnot
  • , Inka Ristow
  • , Markus Sauer
  • , Donjete Simnica
  • , Christoph Schultheiß
  • , Rebekka Scholz
  • , Eray Goekkurt
  • , Lisa von Wenserski
  • , Edith Willscher
  • , Lisa Paschold
  • , Sylvie Lorenzen
  • , Jorge Riera-Knorrenschild
  • , Reinhard Depenbusch
  • , Thomas J. Ettrich
  • , Steffen Dörfel
  • , Salah Eddin Al-Batran
  • , Meinolf Karthaus
  • , Uwe Pelzer
  • , Axel Hinke
  • , Marcus Bauer
  • Chiara Massa, Barbara Seliger, Claudia Wickenhauser, Carsten Bokemeyer, Susanna Hegewisch-Becker, Mascha Binder, Alexander Stein
  • University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf
  • Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg
  • Hämatologisch-Onkologischen Praxis Eppendorf
  • Somnomar Institut für Medizinische Forschung und Schlafmedizin
  • Private Practice Onkodoc GmbH Götersloh
  • University Medical Center Ulm and Center of Excellence 'Metabolic Disorders'
  • Private Practice Onkozentrum Dresden
  • Institute of Clinical Cancer Research Institut für Klinisch-Onkologische Forschung (IKF) at Northwest Hospital
  • Munich Hospital Neuperlach
  • Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin
  • Clinical Cancer Research Consulting (CCRC)
  • University Hospital

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

22 Scopus citations

Abstract

Introduction: In metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), the efficacy of immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) has so far been limited to patients with microsatellite instability high tumors (MSI-H). Unfortunately, most mCRC patients suffer from non-immunogenic microsatellite stable (MSS) tumors. Therefore, new combinatorial strategies are urgently needed to enhance the immunogenicity of MSS tumors to finally increase the number of patients benefiting from ICB. Methods: The AVETUX trial aimed to combine the PD-L1 antibody avelumab with the standard of care chemotherapy combination FOLFOX and the anti-EGFR antibody cetuximab. Furthermore, we performed a central radiological review of the pre- and on-treatment computed tomography scans to better define the individual response to treatment. Results and Discussion: In total, 43 patients were treated of which 39 patients were confirmed as RAS/BRAF wildtype in central tissue review and finally response evaluated. A final progression-free survival (PFS) of 11.1 (range: 0.8 to 22.3 months) and a herein updated final overall survival (OS) of 32.9 months (range: 0.8 to 47.1 months) was reached. We observed a strong median depth of response of 67.5% tumor shrinkage and deepness of response correlated significantly with survival. On the other hand, early tumor shrinkage was not an indicator of better outcome at a cut-off of 20% (median values). In a next step, we correlated the individual best radiological response with potential ICB response biomarkers and found that the clonality and diversity, but not frequency of tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TiLs) and peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs), strongly correlated with response. In summary, we report the final overall survival of the AVETUX trial and propose T cell clonality and diversity as a potential marker to predict response to chemo-immunotherapy combinations in MSS mCRC by performing a central radiological review. Clinical Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier (NCT03174405).

Original languageEnglish
Article number993611
JournalFrontiers in Oncology
Volume12
DOIs
StatePublished - 20 Dec 2022

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • ETS
  • MSS mCRC
  • T cell diversity
  • deepness of response
  • immunotherapy

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Translational analysis and final efficacy of the AVETUX trial – Avelumab, cetuximab and FOLFOX in metastatic colorectal cancer'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this