Abstract
Background The Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D) and the Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) are scales used frequently to rate the symptoms of depression. There are many situations in which it is important to know what a given total score or a percent reduction from baseline score of one scale means in relation to the other scale. Method We used the equipercentile linking method to identify corresponding scores of simultaneous HAM-D and MADRS ratings in 4388 patients from 31 mirtazapine trials in major depressive disorder. Data were collected at baseline and at weeks 1, 2 and 4. Results HAM-D scores of 10, 20, 30 and 40 roughly corresponded to MADRS scores of 13, 26, 39 and 52–53, respectively. An absolute HAM-D improvement of 10, 20, 25 points corresponded to a MADRS improvement of 12, 26, and 34. A percentage improvement from baseline of the HAM-D was approximately the same as a percentage improvement on the MADRS. Conclusion These results are important for the comparison of trials that used the HAM-D and MADRS. We present conversion tables for future research.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 326-331 |
| Number of pages | 6 |
| Journal | Journal of Affective Disorders |
| Volume | 226 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 15 Jan 2018 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
Keywords
- Clinical relevance
- Equipercentile linking
- Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D)
- Major depression
- Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS)
- Schizophrenia
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Translating the HAM-D into the MADRS and vice versa with equipercentile linking'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver