Translating the HAM-D into the MADRS and vice versa with equipercentile linking

Stefan Leucht, Hein Fennema, Rolf R. Engel, Marion Kaspers-Janssen, Armin Szegedi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

63 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background The Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D) and the Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) are scales used frequently to rate the symptoms of depression. There are many situations in which it is important to know what a given total score or a percent reduction from baseline score of one scale means in relation to the other scale. Method We used the equipercentile linking method to identify corresponding scores of simultaneous HAM-D and MADRS ratings in 4388 patients from 31 mirtazapine trials in major depressive disorder. Data were collected at baseline and at weeks 1, 2 and 4. Results HAM-D scores of 10, 20, 30 and 40 roughly corresponded to MADRS scores of 13, 26, 39 and 52–53, respectively. An absolute HAM-D improvement of 10, 20, 25 points corresponded to a MADRS improvement of 12, 26, and 34. A percentage improvement from baseline of the HAM-D was approximately the same as a percentage improvement on the MADRS. Conclusion These results are important for the comparison of trials that used the HAM-D and MADRS. We present conversion tables for future research.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)326-331
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Affective Disorders
Volume226
DOIs
StatePublished - 15 Jan 2018
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Clinical relevance
  • Equipercentile linking
  • Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D)
  • Major depression
  • Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS)
  • Schizophrenia

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Translating the HAM-D into the MADRS and vice versa with equipercentile linking'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this