TY - JOUR
T1 - Translating the HAM-D into the MADRS and vice versa with equipercentile linking
AU - Leucht, Stefan
AU - Fennema, Hein
AU - Engel, Rolf R.
AU - Kaspers-Janssen, Marion
AU - Szegedi, Armin
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 Elsevier B.V.
PY - 2018/1/15
Y1 - 2018/1/15
N2 - Background The Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D) and the Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) are scales used frequently to rate the symptoms of depression. There are many situations in which it is important to know what a given total score or a percent reduction from baseline score of one scale means in relation to the other scale. Method We used the equipercentile linking method to identify corresponding scores of simultaneous HAM-D and MADRS ratings in 4388 patients from 31 mirtazapine trials in major depressive disorder. Data were collected at baseline and at weeks 1, 2 and 4. Results HAM-D scores of 10, 20, 30 and 40 roughly corresponded to MADRS scores of 13, 26, 39 and 52–53, respectively. An absolute HAM-D improvement of 10, 20, 25 points corresponded to a MADRS improvement of 12, 26, and 34. A percentage improvement from baseline of the HAM-D was approximately the same as a percentage improvement on the MADRS. Conclusion These results are important for the comparison of trials that used the HAM-D and MADRS. We present conversion tables for future research.
AB - Background The Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D) and the Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) are scales used frequently to rate the symptoms of depression. There are many situations in which it is important to know what a given total score or a percent reduction from baseline score of one scale means in relation to the other scale. Method We used the equipercentile linking method to identify corresponding scores of simultaneous HAM-D and MADRS ratings in 4388 patients from 31 mirtazapine trials in major depressive disorder. Data were collected at baseline and at weeks 1, 2 and 4. Results HAM-D scores of 10, 20, 30 and 40 roughly corresponded to MADRS scores of 13, 26, 39 and 52–53, respectively. An absolute HAM-D improvement of 10, 20, 25 points corresponded to a MADRS improvement of 12, 26, and 34. A percentage improvement from baseline of the HAM-D was approximately the same as a percentage improvement on the MADRS. Conclusion These results are important for the comparison of trials that used the HAM-D and MADRS. We present conversion tables for future research.
KW - Clinical relevance
KW - Equipercentile linking
KW - Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D)
KW - Major depression
KW - Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS)
KW - Schizophrenia
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85031039060&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jad.2017.09.042
DO - 10.1016/j.jad.2017.09.042
M3 - Article
C2 - 29031182
AN - SCOPUS:85031039060
SN - 0165-0327
VL - 226
SP - 326
EP - 331
JO - Journal of Affective Disorders
JF - Journal of Affective Disorders
ER -