TY - JOUR
T1 - Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation for Failing Surgical Aortic Bioprosthetic Valve
T2 - From Concept to Clinical Application and Evaluation (Part 1)
AU - Piazza, Nicolo
AU - Bleiziffer, Sabine
AU - Brockmann, Gernot
AU - Hendrick, Ruge
AU - Deutsch, Marcus André
AU - Opitz, Anke
AU - Mazzitelli, Domenico
AU - Tassani-Prell, Peter
AU - Schreiber, Christian
AU - Lange, Rdiger
PY - 2011/7
Y1 - 2011/7
N2 - With an aging population, improvement in life expectancy, and significant increase in the use of bioprosthetic valves, structural valve deterioration will become more and more prevalent. The operative mortality for an elective redo aortic valve surgery is reported to range from 2% to 7%, but this percentage can increase to more than 30% in high-risk and nonelective patients. Because transcatheter aortic valve (TAV)-in-surgical aortic valve (SAV) implantation represents a minimally invasive alternative to conventional redo surgery, it may prove to be safer and just as effective as redo surgery. Of course, prospective comparisons with a large number of patients and long-term follow-up are required to confirm these potential advantages. It is axiomatic that knowledge of the basic construction and dimensions, radiographic identification, and potential failure modes of SAV bioprostheses is fundamental in understanding key principles involved in TAV-in-SAV implantation. The goals of this paper are: 1) to review the classification, physical characteristics, and potential failure modes of surgical bioprosthetic aortic valves; and 2) to discuss patient selection and procedural techniques relevant to TAV-in-SAV implantation.
AB - With an aging population, improvement in life expectancy, and significant increase in the use of bioprosthetic valves, structural valve deterioration will become more and more prevalent. The operative mortality for an elective redo aortic valve surgery is reported to range from 2% to 7%, but this percentage can increase to more than 30% in high-risk and nonelective patients. Because transcatheter aortic valve (TAV)-in-surgical aortic valve (SAV) implantation represents a minimally invasive alternative to conventional redo surgery, it may prove to be safer and just as effective as redo surgery. Of course, prospective comparisons with a large number of patients and long-term follow-up are required to confirm these potential advantages. It is axiomatic that knowledge of the basic construction and dimensions, radiographic identification, and potential failure modes of SAV bioprostheses is fundamental in understanding key principles involved in TAV-in-SAV implantation. The goals of this paper are: 1) to review the classification, physical characteristics, and potential failure modes of surgical bioprosthetic aortic valves; and 2) to discuss patient selection and procedural techniques relevant to TAV-in-SAV implantation.
KW - TAV-in-SAV implantation
KW - TAVI
KW - TAVR
KW - aortic regurgitation
KW - aortic stenosis
KW - bioprosthetic valve failure
KW - surgical bioprosthetic valve
KW - transcatheter aortic valve
KW - transcatheter aortic valve implantation
KW - transcatheter aortic valve in surgical aortic valve implantation
KW - transcatheter aortic valve replacement
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79960568094&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jcin.2011.03.016
DO - 10.1016/j.jcin.2011.03.016
M3 - Review article
C2 - 21777879
AN - SCOPUS:79960568094
SN - 1936-8798
VL - 4
SP - 721
EP - 732
JO - JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions
JF - JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions
IS - 7
ER -