TY - JOUR
T1 - ToxNet
T2 - an artificial intelligence designed for decision support for toxin prediction
AU - Zellner, Tobias
AU - Romanek, Katrin
AU - Rabe, Christian
AU - Schmoll, Sabrina
AU - Geith, Stefanie
AU - Heier, Eva Carina
AU - Stich, Raphael
AU - Burwinkel, Hendrik
AU - Keicher, Matthias
AU - Bani-Harouni, David
AU - Navab, Nassir
AU - Ahmadi, Seyed Ahmad
AU - Eyer, Florian
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
PY - 2023
Y1 - 2023
N2 - Background: Artificial intelligences (AIs) are emerging in the field of medical informatics in many areas. They are mostly used for diagnosis support in medical imaging but have potential uses in many other fields of medicine where large datasets are available. Aim: To develop an artificial intelligence (AI) “ToxNet”, a machine-learning based computer-aided diagnosis (CADx) system, which aims to predict poisons based on patient’s symptoms and metadata from our Poison Control Center (PCC) data. To prove its accuracy and compare it against medical doctors (MDs). Methods: The CADx system was developed and trained using data from 781,278 calls recorded in our PCC database from 2001 to 2019. All cases were mono-intoxications. Patient symptoms and meta-information (e.g., age group, sex, etiology, toxin point of entry, weekday, etc.) were provided. In the pilot phase, the AI was trained on 10 substances, the AI’s prediction was compared to naïve matching, literature matching, a multi-layer perceptron (MLP), and the graph attention network (GAT). The trained AI’s accuracy was then compared to 10 medical doctors in an individual and in an identical dataset. The dataset was then expanded to 28 substances and the predictions and comparisons repeated. Results: In the pilot, the prediction performance in a set of 8995 patients with 10 substances was 0.66 ± 0.01 (F1 micro score). Our CADx system was significantly superior to naïve matching, literature matching, MLP, and GAT (p < 0.005). It outperformed our physicians experienced in clinical toxicology in the individual and identical dataset. In the extended dataset, our CADx system was able to predict the correct toxin in a set of 36,033 patients with 28 substances with an overall performance of 0.27 ± 0.01 (F1 micro score), also significantly superior to naïve matching, literature matching, MLP, and GAT. It also outperformed our MDs. Conclusion: Our AI trained on a large PCC database works well for poison prediction in these experiments. With further research, it might become a valuable aid for physicians in predicting unknown substances and might be the first step into AI use in PCCs.
AB - Background: Artificial intelligences (AIs) are emerging in the field of medical informatics in many areas. They are mostly used for diagnosis support in medical imaging but have potential uses in many other fields of medicine where large datasets are available. Aim: To develop an artificial intelligence (AI) “ToxNet”, a machine-learning based computer-aided diagnosis (CADx) system, which aims to predict poisons based on patient’s symptoms and metadata from our Poison Control Center (PCC) data. To prove its accuracy and compare it against medical doctors (MDs). Methods: The CADx system was developed and trained using data from 781,278 calls recorded in our PCC database from 2001 to 2019. All cases were mono-intoxications. Patient symptoms and meta-information (e.g., age group, sex, etiology, toxin point of entry, weekday, etc.) were provided. In the pilot phase, the AI was trained on 10 substances, the AI’s prediction was compared to naïve matching, literature matching, a multi-layer perceptron (MLP), and the graph attention network (GAT). The trained AI’s accuracy was then compared to 10 medical doctors in an individual and in an identical dataset. The dataset was then expanded to 28 substances and the predictions and comparisons repeated. Results: In the pilot, the prediction performance in a set of 8995 patients with 10 substances was 0.66 ± 0.01 (F1 micro score). Our CADx system was significantly superior to naïve matching, literature matching, MLP, and GAT (p < 0.005). It outperformed our physicians experienced in clinical toxicology in the individual and identical dataset. In the extended dataset, our CADx system was able to predict the correct toxin in a set of 36,033 patients with 28 substances with an overall performance of 0.27 ± 0.01 (F1 micro score), also significantly superior to naïve matching, literature matching, MLP, and GAT. It also outperformed our MDs. Conclusion: Our AI trained on a large PCC database works well for poison prediction in these experiments. With further research, it might become a valuable aid for physicians in predicting unknown substances and might be the first step into AI use in PCCs.
KW - Toxin prediction
KW - artificial intelligence
KW - disease classification
KW - graph convolutional networks
KW - representation learning
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85142149917&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/15563650.2022.2144345
DO - 10.1080/15563650.2022.2144345
M3 - Article
C2 - 36373611
AN - SCOPUS:85142149917
SN - 1556-3650
VL - 61
SP - 56
EP - 63
JO - Clinical Toxicology
JF - Clinical Toxicology
IS - 1
ER -