TY - JOUR
T1 - Toxicity of fluoride
T2 - critical evaluation of evidence for human developmental neurotoxicity in epidemiological studies, animal experiments and in vitro analyses
AU - Guth, Sabine
AU - Hüser, Stephanie
AU - Roth, Angelika
AU - Degen, Gisela
AU - Diel, Patrick
AU - Edlund, Karolina
AU - Eisenbrand, Gerhard
AU - Engel, Karl Heinz
AU - Epe, Bernd
AU - Grune, Tilman
AU - Heinz, Volker
AU - Henle, Thomas
AU - Humpf, Hans Ulrich
AU - Jäger, Henry
AU - Joost, Hans Georg
AU - Kulling, Sabine E.
AU - Lampen, Alfonso
AU - Mally, Angela
AU - Marchan, Rosemarie
AU - Marko, Doris
AU - Mühle, Eva
AU - Nitsche, Michael A.
AU - Röhrdanz, Elke
AU - Stadler, Richard
AU - van Thriel, Christoph
AU - Vieths, Stefan
AU - Vogel, Rudi F.
AU - Wascher, Edmund
AU - Watzl, Carsten
AU - Nöthlings, Ute
AU - Hengstler, Jan G.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020, The Author(s).
PY - 2020/5/1
Y1 - 2020/5/1
N2 - Recently, epidemiological studies have suggested that fluoride is a human developmental neurotoxicant that reduces measures of intelligence in children, placing it into the same category as toxic metals (lead, methylmercury, arsenic) and polychlorinated biphenyls. If true, this assessment would be highly relevant considering the widespread fluoridation of drinking water and the worldwide use of fluoride in oral hygiene products such as toothpaste. To gain a deeper understanding of these assertions, we reviewed the levels of human exposure, as well as results from animal experiments, particularly focusing on developmental toxicity, and the molecular mechanisms by which fluoride can cause adverse effects. Moreover, in vitro studies investigating fluoride in neuronal cells and precursor/stem cells were analyzed, and 23 epidemiological studies published since 2012 were considered. The results show that the margin of exposure (MoE) between no observed adverse effect levels (NOAELs) in animal studies and the current adequate intake (AI) of fluoride (50 µg/kg b.w./day) in humans ranges between 50 and 210, depending on the specific animal experiment used as reference. Even for unusually high fluoride exposure levels, an MoE of at least ten was obtained. Furthermore, concentrations of fluoride in human plasma are much lower than fluoride concentrations, causing effects in cell cultures. In contrast, 21 of 23 recent epidemiological studies report an association between high fluoride exposure and reduced intelligence. The discrepancy between experimental and epidemiological evidence may be reconciled with deficiencies inherent in most of these epidemiological studies on a putative association between fluoride and intelligence, especially with respect to adequate consideration of potential confounding factors, e.g., socioeconomic status, residence, breast feeding, low birth weight, maternal intelligence, and exposure to other neurotoxic chemicals. In conclusion, based on the totality of currently available scientific evidence, the present review does not support the presumption that fluoride should be assessed as a human developmental neurotoxicant at the current exposure levels in Europe.
AB - Recently, epidemiological studies have suggested that fluoride is a human developmental neurotoxicant that reduces measures of intelligence in children, placing it into the same category as toxic metals (lead, methylmercury, arsenic) and polychlorinated biphenyls. If true, this assessment would be highly relevant considering the widespread fluoridation of drinking water and the worldwide use of fluoride in oral hygiene products such as toothpaste. To gain a deeper understanding of these assertions, we reviewed the levels of human exposure, as well as results from animal experiments, particularly focusing on developmental toxicity, and the molecular mechanisms by which fluoride can cause adverse effects. Moreover, in vitro studies investigating fluoride in neuronal cells and precursor/stem cells were analyzed, and 23 epidemiological studies published since 2012 were considered. The results show that the margin of exposure (MoE) between no observed adverse effect levels (NOAELs) in animal studies and the current adequate intake (AI) of fluoride (50 µg/kg b.w./day) in humans ranges between 50 and 210, depending on the specific animal experiment used as reference. Even for unusually high fluoride exposure levels, an MoE of at least ten was obtained. Furthermore, concentrations of fluoride in human plasma are much lower than fluoride concentrations, causing effects in cell cultures. In contrast, 21 of 23 recent epidemiological studies report an association between high fluoride exposure and reduced intelligence. The discrepancy between experimental and epidemiological evidence may be reconciled with deficiencies inherent in most of these epidemiological studies on a putative association between fluoride and intelligence, especially with respect to adequate consideration of potential confounding factors, e.g., socioeconomic status, residence, breast feeding, low birth weight, maternal intelligence, and exposure to other neurotoxic chemicals. In conclusion, based on the totality of currently available scientific evidence, the present review does not support the presumption that fluoride should be assessed as a human developmental neurotoxicant at the current exposure levels in Europe.
KW - Animal studies
KW - Developmental neurotoxicity
KW - Epidemiological studies
KW - In vitro data
KW - Risk assessment
KW - Sodium fluoride
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85084296144
U2 - 10.1007/s00204-020-02725-2
DO - 10.1007/s00204-020-02725-2
M3 - Review article
C2 - 32382957
AN - SCOPUS:85084296144
SN - 0340-5761
VL - 94
SP - 1375
EP - 1415
JO - Archives of Toxicology
JF - Archives of Toxicology
IS - 5
ER -