Abstract
The role and design of global expert organizations such as the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) or the Intergovernmental Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES) needs rethinking. Acknowledging that a one-size-fits- All model does not exist, we suggest a reflexive turn that implies treating the governance of expertise as a matter of political contestation.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 80-87 |
| Number of pages | 8 |
| Journal | GAIA - Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society |
| Volume | 23 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - May 2014 |
| Externally published | Yes |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 13 Climate Action
Keywords
- Assessment
- Environmental governance
- Expert organizations
- IPBES
- IPCC
- Science-policy interface
- Scientific advice
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Towards a reflexive turn in the governance of global environmental expertise the cases of the IPCC and the IPBES'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver