TOWARDS A COGNITIVE THEORY OF VISUAL EXPERTISE: Methods of inquiry

Andreas Gegenfurtner, Hans Gruber, Doris Holzberger, Özün Keskin, Erno Lehtinen, Tina Seidel, Kathleen Stürmer, Roger Säljö

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterpeer-review

10 Scopus citations

Abstract

A cognitive theory of visual expertise is proposed to model the visual information processing of domain experts. During theory development, we integrated empirical evidence from multiple methods of inquiry—including qualitative observations, qualitative interviews, eye tracking and neuroimaging—used in research on learning and instruction in the professions. Devoted to understand the skilled perception, interpretation and evaluation of visual information in work tasks, the theory is based on three underlying assumptions: extended capacity, knowledge-based processing and practice-based interaction. Expert professional vision is described as a set of eight processes in the visual register and long-term working memory; these processes are selecting visual information, ignoring visual information, knowledge-based noticing, extending the visual field through parafoveal processing, organising image chunks, integrating, using visual practices to interact with the environment and monitoring. We discuss the educational and methodological implications of the theory as they relate (a) to the expertise development of novices through training and deliberate practice in vision-intensive workplaces—including, but not limited to, the arts, education, sports, medicine, transportation and programming—and (b) to the use of mixed methods when studying professional vision.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationRe-Theorising Learning And Research Methods In Learning Research
PublisherTaylor and Francis
Pages142-158
Number of pages17
ISBN (Electronic)9781000959482
ISBN (Print)9781032071879
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Jan 2023

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'TOWARDS A COGNITIVE THEORY OF VISUAL EXPERTISE: Methods of inquiry'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this