TY - JOUR
T1 - Toward a systematic grading for the selection of patients to undergo awake surgery
T2 - identifying suitable predictor variables
AU - Kram, Leonie
AU - Neu, Beate
AU - Schroeder, Axel
AU - Wiestler, Benedikt
AU - Meyer, Bernhard
AU - Krieg, Sandro M.
AU - Ille, Sebastian
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2024 Kram, Neu, Schroeder, Wiestler, Meyer, Krieg and Ille.
PY - 2024
Y1 - 2024
N2 - Background: Awake craniotomy is the standard of care for treating language eloquent gliomas. However, depending on preoperative functionality, it is not feasible in each patient and selection criteria are highly heterogeneous. Thus, this study aimed to identify broadly applicable predictor variables allowing for a more systematic and objective patient selection. Methods: We performed post-hoc analyses of preoperative language status, patient and tumor characteristics including language eloquence of 96 glioma patients treated in a single neurosurgical center between 05/2018 and 01/2021. Multinomial logistic regression and stepwise variable selection were applied to identify significant predictors of awake surgery feasibility. Results: Stepwise backward selection confirmed that a higher number of paraphasias, lower age, and high language eloquence level were suitable indicators for an awake surgery in our cohort. Subsequent descriptive and ROC-analyses indicated a cut-off at ≤54 years and a language eloquence level of at least 6 for awake surgeries, which require further validation. A high language eloquence, lower age, preexisting semantic and phonological aphasic symptoms have shown to be suitable predictors. Conclusion: The combination of these factors may act as a basis for a systematic and standardized grading of patients’ suitability for an awake craniotomy which is easily integrable into the preoperative workflow across neurosurgical centers.
AB - Background: Awake craniotomy is the standard of care for treating language eloquent gliomas. However, depending on preoperative functionality, it is not feasible in each patient and selection criteria are highly heterogeneous. Thus, this study aimed to identify broadly applicable predictor variables allowing for a more systematic and objective patient selection. Methods: We performed post-hoc analyses of preoperative language status, patient and tumor characteristics including language eloquence of 96 glioma patients treated in a single neurosurgical center between 05/2018 and 01/2021. Multinomial logistic regression and stepwise variable selection were applied to identify significant predictors of awake surgery feasibility. Results: Stepwise backward selection confirmed that a higher number of paraphasias, lower age, and high language eloquence level were suitable indicators for an awake surgery in our cohort. Subsequent descriptive and ROC-analyses indicated a cut-off at ≤54 years and a language eloquence level of at least 6 for awake surgeries, which require further validation. A high language eloquence, lower age, preexisting semantic and phonological aphasic symptoms have shown to be suitable predictors. Conclusion: The combination of these factors may act as a basis for a systematic and standardized grading of patients’ suitability for an awake craniotomy which is easily integrable into the preoperative workflow across neurosurgical centers.
KW - awake craniotomy
KW - glioma
KW - language eloquence
KW - multinomial logistic regression
KW - preoperative language status
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85193214622&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3389/fnhum.2024.1365215
DO - 10.3389/fnhum.2024.1365215
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85193214622
SN - 1662-5161
VL - 18
JO - Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
JF - Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
M1 - 1365215
ER -