Abstract
While optical remote sensing has demonstrated its capabilities for landslide detection and monitoring, spatial and temporal demands for landslide early warning systems (LEWSs) had not been met until recently. We introduce a novel conceptual approach to structure and quantitatively assess lead time for LEWSs. We analysed "time to warning"as a sequence: (i) time to collect, (ii) time to process and (iii) time to evaluate relevant optical data. The difference between the time to warning and "forecasting window"(i.e. time from hazard becoming predictable until event) is the lead time for reactive measures. We tested digital image correlation (DIC) of best-suited spatiotemporal techniques, i.e. 3gm resolution PlanetScope daily imagery and 0.16gm resolution unmanned aerial system (UAS)-derived orthophotos to reveal fast ground displacement and acceleration of a deep-seated, complex alpine mass movement leading to massive debris flow events. The time to warning for the UAS/PlanetScope totals 31/21gh and is comprised of time to (i) collect - 12/14gh, (ii) process - 17/5gh and (iii) evaluate - 2/2gh, which is well below the forecasting window for recent benchmarks and facilitates a lead time for reactive measures. We show optical remote sensing data can support LEWSs with a sufficiently fast processing time, demonstrating the feasibility of optical sensors for LEWSs.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 2753-2772 |
| Number of pages | 20 |
| Journal | Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences |
| Volume | 21 |
| Issue number | 9 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 8 Sep 2021 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Timely prediction potential of landslide early warning systems with multispectral remote sensing: A conceptual approach tested in the Sattelkar, Austria'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver