TY - JOUR
T1 - The value of seasonal forecasts for irrigated, supplementary irrigated, And rainfed wheat cropping systems in northwest Mexico
AU - Ramírez-Rodrigues, Melissa A.
AU - Alderman, Phillip D.
AU - Stefanova, Lydia
AU - Cossani, C. Mariano
AU - Flores, Dagoberto
AU - Asseng, Senthold
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2016 Elsevier B.V..
PY - 2016/9/1
Y1 - 2016/9/1
N2 - Half of global wheat production occurs in irrigated cropping regions that face increasing water shortages. In these regions, seasonal forecasts could provide information about in-season climate conditions that could improve resource management, helping to save water and other inputs. However, seasonal forecasts have not been tested in irrigated systems. In this study, we show that seasonal forecasts have the potential to guide crop management decisions in fully irrigated systems (FIS), reduced irrigation systems (supplementary irrigation; SIS), and systems without irrigation (rainfed; RFS) in an arid environment. We found that farmers could gain an additional 2 USD ha-1 season-1 in net returns and save up to 26 USD ha-1 season-1 in N fertilizer costs with a hypothetical always-correct-season-type-forecast (ACF) in a fully irrigated system compared to simulated optimized N fertilizer applications. In supplementary irrigated systems, an ACF had value when deciding on sowing a crop (plus supplementary irrigation) of up to 65 USD ha-1 season-1. In rainfed systems, this value was up to 123 USD ha-1 when deciding whether or not to sow a crop. In supplementary irrigated and rainfed systems, such value depended on initial soil water conditions. Seasonal forecasts have the potential to assist farmers in irrigated, supplementary irrigated, and rainfed cropping systems to maximize crop profitability. However, forecasts currently available based on Global Circulation Models (GCM) and the El Niño Southern Oscillation (ENSO) need higher forecast skill before such benefits can be fully realized.
AB - Half of global wheat production occurs in irrigated cropping regions that face increasing water shortages. In these regions, seasonal forecasts could provide information about in-season climate conditions that could improve resource management, helping to save water and other inputs. However, seasonal forecasts have not been tested in irrigated systems. In this study, we show that seasonal forecasts have the potential to guide crop management decisions in fully irrigated systems (FIS), reduced irrigation systems (supplementary irrigation; SIS), and systems without irrigation (rainfed; RFS) in an arid environment. We found that farmers could gain an additional 2 USD ha-1 season-1 in net returns and save up to 26 USD ha-1 season-1 in N fertilizer costs with a hypothetical always-correct-season-type-forecast (ACF) in a fully irrigated system compared to simulated optimized N fertilizer applications. In supplementary irrigated systems, an ACF had value when deciding on sowing a crop (plus supplementary irrigation) of up to 65 USD ha-1 season-1. In rainfed systems, this value was up to 123 USD ha-1 when deciding whether or not to sow a crop. In supplementary irrigated and rainfed systems, such value depended on initial soil water conditions. Seasonal forecasts have the potential to assist farmers in irrigated, supplementary irrigated, and rainfed cropping systems to maximize crop profitability. However, forecasts currently available based on Global Circulation Models (GCM) and the El Niño Southern Oscillation (ENSO) need higher forecast skill before such benefits can be fully realized.
KW - Arid environment
KW - Irrigation
KW - Mexico
KW - Seasonal forecast
KW - Supplementary irrigation
KW - Wheat
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84973174722&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.agsy.2016.05.005
DO - 10.1016/j.agsy.2016.05.005
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84973174722
SN - 0308-521X
VL - 147
SP - 76
EP - 86
JO - Agricultural Systems
JF - Agricultural Systems
ER -
