Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

The value of manure - Manure as co-product in life cycle assessment

  • Adrian Leip
  • , Stewart Ledgard
  • , Aimable Uwizeye
  • , Julio C.P. Palhares
  • , M. Fernanda Aller
  • , Barbara Amon
  • , Michael Binder
  • , Claudia M.d.S. Cordovil
  • , Camillo De Camillis
  • , Hongming Dong
  • , Alessandra Fusi
  • , Janne Helin
  • , Stefan Hörtenhuber
  • , Alexander N. Hristov
  • , Richard Koelsch
  • , Chunjiang Liu
  • , Cargele Masso
  • , Nsalambi V. Nkongolo
  • , Amlan K. Patra
  • , Matthew R. Redding
  • Mariana C. Rufino, Ruben Sakrabani, Greg Thoma, Françoise Vertès, Ying Wang
  • European Commission Joint Research Centre
  • Ruakura Research Centre
  • Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
  • Wageningen University and Research Centre
  • Johnstown Castle
  • Embrapa-Cerrados
  • I.S.Environment
  • Leibniz Institute for Agricultural Engineering and Bioeconomy
  • Evonik Nutrition and Care GmbH
  • Instituto Superior de Agronomia, Universidade de Lisboa
  • Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences
  • Ministry of Agriculture of the People's Republic of China
  • University of Manchester
  • Natural Resources Institute Finland (Luke)
  • Research Institute of Organic Agriculture FiBL
  • The Pennsylvania State University
  • University of Nebraska Lincoln
  • Shanghai Jiao Tong University
  • International Institute of Tropical Agriculture Yaounde
  • Climate and Water
  • University of South Africa
  • Dem. Rep
  • West Bengal University of Animal and Fishery Sciences
  • Dept. of Primary Industries/APSRU
  • Lancaster Environment Centre
  • Cranfield University
  • University of Arkansas
  • AgroCampus-Ouest, UMR1345, Institut de Recherche en Horticulture et Semences
  • Innovation Center for U.S. Dairy

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

60 Scopus citations

Abstract

Livestock production is important for food security, nutrition, and landscape maintenance, but it is associated with several environmental impacts. To assess the risk and benefits arising from livestock production, transparent and robust indicators are required, such as those offered by life cycle assessment. A central question in such approaches is how environmental burden is allocated to livestock products and to manure that is re-used for agricultural production. To incentivize sustainable use of manure, it should be considered as a co-product as long as it is not disposed of, or wasted, or applied in excess of crop nutrient needs, in which case it should be treated as a waste. This paper proposes a theoretical approach to define nutrient requirements based on nutrient response curves to economic and physical optima and a pragmatic approach based on crop nutrient yield adjusted for nutrient losses to atmosphere and water. Allocation of environmental burden to manure and other livestock products is then based on the nutrient value from manure for crop production using the price of fertilizer nutrients. We illustrate and discuss the proposed method with two case studies.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)293-304
Number of pages12
JournalJournal of Environmental Management
Volume241
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Jul 2019
Externally publishedYes

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 2 - Zero Hunger
    SDG 2 Zero Hunger
  2. SDG 6 - Clean Water and Sanitation
    SDG 6 Clean Water and Sanitation
  3. SDG 8 - Decent Work and Economic Growth
    SDG 8 Decent Work and Economic Growth
  4. SDG 9 - Industry, Innovation, and Infrastructure
    SDG 9 Industry, Innovation, and Infrastructure
  5. SDG 12 - Responsible Consumption and Production
    SDG 12 Responsible Consumption and Production

Keywords

  • Allocation
  • Fertilizer
  • Life cycle assessment
  • Livestock supply chains
  • Manure
  • Nutrients

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The value of manure - Manure as co-product in life cycle assessment'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this