TY - JOUR
T1 - The speed of biased random walk among random conductances
AU - Berger, Noam
AU - Gantert, Nina
AU - Nagel, Jan
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© Association des Publications de l’Institut Henri Poincaré, 2019.
PY - 2019/5
Y1 - 2019/5
N2 - We consider biased random walk among iid, uniformly elliptic conductances on Zd, and investigate the monotonicity of the velocity as a function of the bias. It is not hard to see that if the bias is large enough, the velocity is increasing as a function of the bias. Our main result is that if the disorder is small, i.e. all the conductances are close enough to each other, the velocity is always strictly increasing as a function of the bias, see Theorem 1.1. A crucial ingredient of the proof is a formula for the derivative of the velocity, which can be written as a covariance, see Theorem 1.3: it follows along the lines of the proof of the Einstein relation in (Ann. Probab. 45 (4) (2017) 2533–2567). On the other hand, we give a counterexample showing that for iid, uniformly elliptic conductances, the velocity is not always increasing as a function of the bias. More precisely, if d = 2 and if the conductances take the values 1 (with probability p) and κ (with probability 1 − p) and p is close enough to 1 and κ small enough, the velocity is not increasing as a function of the bias, see Theorem 1.2.
AB - We consider biased random walk among iid, uniformly elliptic conductances on Zd, and investigate the monotonicity of the velocity as a function of the bias. It is not hard to see that if the bias is large enough, the velocity is increasing as a function of the bias. Our main result is that if the disorder is small, i.e. all the conductances are close enough to each other, the velocity is always strictly increasing as a function of the bias, see Theorem 1.1. A crucial ingredient of the proof is a formula for the derivative of the velocity, which can be written as a covariance, see Theorem 1.3: it follows along the lines of the proof of the Einstein relation in (Ann. Probab. 45 (4) (2017) 2533–2567). On the other hand, we give a counterexample showing that for iid, uniformly elliptic conductances, the velocity is not always increasing as a function of the bias. More precisely, if d = 2 and if the conductances take the values 1 (with probability p) and κ (with probability 1 − p) and p is close enough to 1 and κ small enough, the velocity is not increasing as a function of the bias, see Theorem 1.2.
KW - Effective velocity
KW - Random conductances
KW - Random walk in random environment
KW - Regeneration times
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85066146832&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1214/18-AIHP901
DO - 10.1214/18-AIHP901
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85066146832
SN - 0246-0203
VL - 55
SP - 862
EP - 881
JO - Annales de l'institut Henri Poincare (B) Probability and Statistics
JF - Annales de l'institut Henri Poincare (B) Probability and Statistics
IS - 2
ER -