The Spastic Paraplegia Rating Scale (SPRS): A reliable and valid measure of disease severity

R. Schüle, T. Holland-Letz, S. Klimpe, J. Kassubek, T. Klopstock, V. Mall, S. Otto, B. Winner, L. Schöls

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

219 Scopus citations

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To develop and evaluate a clinical Spastic Paraplegia Rating Scale (SPRS) to measure disease severity and progression. METHODS: A 13-item scale was designed to rate functional impairment occurring in pure forms of spastic paraplegia (SP). Additional symptoms constituting a complicated form of SP are recorded in an inventory. Two independent patient cohorts were evaluated in a two-step validation procedure. RESULTS: Application of SPRS requires less than 15 minutes and does not require any special equipment, so it is suitable for an outpatient setting. Interrater agreement of SPRS was high (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.99). Reliability was further supported by high internal consistency (Cronbach α = 0.91). SPRS values were almost normally distributed without apparent floor or ceiling effect. Construct validity was shown by high correlation of SPRS to Barthel Index and the International Cooperative Ataxia Rating Scale (convergent validity) and low correlation to Mini-Mental Status Examination (discriminant validity). CONCLUSION: The Spastic Paraplegia Rating Scale is a reliable and valid measure of disease severity.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)430-434
Number of pages5
JournalNeurology
Volume67
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 2006
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The Spastic Paraplegia Rating Scale (SPRS): A reliable and valid measure of disease severity'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this