Abstract
This study provides new insight into the recent debate on profitability and investment patterns in the cross-section of expected returns. Relying on implied risk premia of U.S. corporate bonds, we document a strong negative relation between exposure to the profitability factor and cost of debt. We do not observe a robust relation between exposure to the investment factor and cost of debt. Our findings are consistent with profitability being a risk factor, but suggest that high profitability implies lower (and not higher) risk. Because the market portfolio consists of all risky assets including corporate bonds, our findings challenge a risk-based explanation for the profitability and investment patterns in stock returns.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 19-35 |
| Number of pages | 17 |
| Journal | Journal of Banking and Finance |
| Volume | 83 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Oct 2017 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Keywords
- Anomalies
- Corporate bonds
- Credit markets
- Expected returns
- Factors
- Market efficiency