TY - JOUR
T1 - The psychologic and psychosocial impact of otoplasty on children and adults
AU - Papadopulos, Nikolaos A.
AU - Niehaus, Richard
AU - Keller, Emanuel
AU - Henrich, Gerhard
AU - Papadopoulos, Othon N.
AU - Staudenmaier, Rainer
AU - Kovacs, Laszlo
AU - Herschbach, Peter
AU - Pototschnig, Hanno
AU - Machens, Hans Günther
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2015 Mutaz B. Habal, MD.
PY - 2015
Y1 - 2015
N2 - Background: In previous studies, our research group already evaluated the impact of aesthetic surgery on "quality of life" (QoL). This study evaluates QoL factors and perceptions of well-being after otoplasty as a single indication. Methods: Eighty-one patients who underwent otoplasty were divided into three age groups: Youth 1 (Y1)=8-12 years (n=17), Youth 1 (Y2)=13-17 years (n=13), and Adult ≥18 years (n=51). For competitive analysis, 2 groups of tests were used: a standardized self-assessment test on life satisfaction (FLZM), the Glasgow Benefit Inventory (GBI), the standardized Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale (RSES), the standardized Freiburg Personality Inventory (FPI-R), the Patient Health Questionnaire 4 (PHQ-4), and a self-developed and indication-specific questionnaire for "Adult" group. The tools for the groups Y1 and Y2 were: PHQ-4, KINDLR, the Glasgow Child Benefit Inventory (GCBI), and a self-developed and indication-specific questionnaire either. Results: Our data bared numerous significant improvements on patients' QoL. In the items "friends" (P=0.036) and "freedom of anxiety" (P=0.034) of the FLZM, important improvements were found. In section "satisfaction with appearance" (body image), the items "hair" (P=0.003) and "ear" (P=0.034) were to point out. The RSES (P=0.001) and the FPI-R (P=0.035) data indicated a well-balanced emotional stability. The results of the GBI/GCBI (P=0.000/P=0.000) showed a higher QoL of postsurgery patients. The data of the KINDLR questionnaire provided increasing values in the modules "friends" (P=0.033) and "total score" (P=0.040) for boys of the ages 8 to 12. For all age groups, there was a less affinity to depression (PHQ-4) and a high satisfaction with the aesthetical result (indication-specific questionnaire). Conclusions: This study showed higher QoL in all age groups by using standardized tools in comparison with the norm data. The knowledge of postoperative psychologic benefits, such as "satisfaction with appearance" (body image) and "different areas of life," self-confidence, and self-esteem as well as lower level of depression support meaningfulness of otoplasty. Level of Evidence: Therapeutic, III: Retrospective cohort or comparative study.
AB - Background: In previous studies, our research group already evaluated the impact of aesthetic surgery on "quality of life" (QoL). This study evaluates QoL factors and perceptions of well-being after otoplasty as a single indication. Methods: Eighty-one patients who underwent otoplasty were divided into three age groups: Youth 1 (Y1)=8-12 years (n=17), Youth 1 (Y2)=13-17 years (n=13), and Adult ≥18 years (n=51). For competitive analysis, 2 groups of tests were used: a standardized self-assessment test on life satisfaction (FLZM), the Glasgow Benefit Inventory (GBI), the standardized Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale (RSES), the standardized Freiburg Personality Inventory (FPI-R), the Patient Health Questionnaire 4 (PHQ-4), and a self-developed and indication-specific questionnaire for "Adult" group. The tools for the groups Y1 and Y2 were: PHQ-4, KINDLR, the Glasgow Child Benefit Inventory (GCBI), and a self-developed and indication-specific questionnaire either. Results: Our data bared numerous significant improvements on patients' QoL. In the items "friends" (P=0.036) and "freedom of anxiety" (P=0.034) of the FLZM, important improvements were found. In section "satisfaction with appearance" (body image), the items "hair" (P=0.003) and "ear" (P=0.034) were to point out. The RSES (P=0.001) and the FPI-R (P=0.035) data indicated a well-balanced emotional stability. The results of the GBI/GCBI (P=0.000/P=0.000) showed a higher QoL of postsurgery patients. The data of the KINDLR questionnaire provided increasing values in the modules "friends" (P=0.033) and "total score" (P=0.040) for boys of the ages 8 to 12. For all age groups, there was a less affinity to depression (PHQ-4) and a high satisfaction with the aesthetical result (indication-specific questionnaire). Conclusions: This study showed higher QoL in all age groups by using standardized tools in comparison with the norm data. The knowledge of postoperative psychologic benefits, such as "satisfaction with appearance" (body image) and "different areas of life," self-confidence, and self-esteem as well as lower level of depression support meaningfulness of otoplasty. Level of Evidence: Therapeutic, III: Retrospective cohort or comparative study.
KW - Aesthetic surgery
KW - Different groups of age
KW - Otoplasty
KW - Patients' satisfaction
KW - Quality of life
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/84948720336
U2 - 10.1097/SCS.0000000000001990
DO - 10.1097/SCS.0000000000001990
M3 - Article
C2 - 26491919
AN - SCOPUS:84948720336
SN - 1049-2275
VL - 26
SP - 2309
EP - 2314
JO - Journal of Craniofacial Surgery
JF - Journal of Craniofacial Surgery
IS - 8
ER -