TY - JOUR
T1 - The methylisothiazolinone epidemic goes along with changing patients' characteristics – After cosmetics, industrial applications are the focus
AU - for the IVDK
AU - Schnuch, Axel
AU - Schubert, Steffen
AU - Lessmann, Holger
AU - Geier, Johannes
AU - Beiteke, Ulrike
AU - Dissemond, Joachim
AU - Buhl, Timo
AU - Schäkel, Knut
AU - Pföhler, Claudia
AU - Dietrich, Cecilia
AU - Worm, Margitta
AU - Bauer, Andrea
AU - Kreft, Burkhard
AU - Schliemann, Sibylle
AU - Brockow, Knut
AU - Becker, Detlef
AU - Forchhammer, Stephan
AU - Recke, Andreas
AU - Witte, Jana
AU - Pfützner, Wolfgang
AU - Coras-Stepanek, Brigitte
AU - Skudlik, Christoph
AU - Wagner, Nicola
AU - Aberer, Werner
AU - Emmert, Steffen
AU - Baron, Jens Malte
AU - Siedlecki, Katharina
AU - Baur, Vera
AU - Schmieder, Astrid
AU - Weisshaar, Elke
AU - Grunwald-Delitz, Heidrun
AU - Trautmann, Axel
AU - Hofmeier, Kathrin Scherer
AU - Szliska, Christiane
AU - Weiß, Johannes
AU - Effendy, Isaak
AU - Jünger, Michael
AU - Brehler, Randolf
AU - Rueff, Franziska
AU - Werfel, Thomas
AU - Dickel, Heinrich
AU - Rieker-Schwienbacher, Juliane
AU - Vieluf, Dieter
AU - Stadler, Rudolf
AU - Simon, Dagmar
AU - Fartasch, Manigé
AU - Micaletto, Sara
AU - Treudler, Regina
AU - Nestoris, Stefan
AU - Mechtel, Dirk
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd
PY - 2020/2/1
Y1 - 2020/2/1
N2 - Background: Sensitization to methylisothiazolinone (MI) has seen an exceptional epidemic, mainly attributed to its use in cosmetics. Objectives: To trace the epidemic of MI allergy (2009–2018), and to analyze a possible change of patients' characteristics. Methods: Informationsverbund Dermatologischer Kliniken-data of patients patch tested between 2009 and 2018 with MI (0.05% aq.) were analyzed concerning anamnestic items and sensitization frequencies. Results: Overall, 4.9% reacted positive to MI. Comparing sensitization to MI in three periods (2009, 2013/14, and 2017/18), there was an increase to 7% in 2013 and a decrease to 3.4% in 2018. The MOAHLFA Index (M=Men, O=Occupational Dermatitis, A=Atopic Dermatitis, L=Leg Dermatitis, F=Face Dermatitis, A= Age > 40) for the period 2013/14 is characterized by a lower proportion of occupational dermatitis and a higher proportion of face dermatitis. The period 2017/18 is characterized by increases of occupational dermatitis and hand dermatitis, and a decrease of face dermatitis. Painters, personal care workers, and hairdressers were particularly affected. Sensitization in hairdressers and personal care workers (mostly cosmeticians) decreased after the peak in 2013/14, whereas sensitization to MI in painters continued to increase. Conclusions: After an unprecedented epidemic of MI allergy, mainly caused by its use in cosmetics, the continuous use of MI in industrial applications, for example, paints, and subsequent sensitization remain a matter of concern.
AB - Background: Sensitization to methylisothiazolinone (MI) has seen an exceptional epidemic, mainly attributed to its use in cosmetics. Objectives: To trace the epidemic of MI allergy (2009–2018), and to analyze a possible change of patients' characteristics. Methods: Informationsverbund Dermatologischer Kliniken-data of patients patch tested between 2009 and 2018 with MI (0.05% aq.) were analyzed concerning anamnestic items and sensitization frequencies. Results: Overall, 4.9% reacted positive to MI. Comparing sensitization to MI in three periods (2009, 2013/14, and 2017/18), there was an increase to 7% in 2013 and a decrease to 3.4% in 2018. The MOAHLFA Index (M=Men, O=Occupational Dermatitis, A=Atopic Dermatitis, L=Leg Dermatitis, F=Face Dermatitis, A= Age > 40) for the period 2013/14 is characterized by a lower proportion of occupational dermatitis and a higher proportion of face dermatitis. The period 2017/18 is characterized by increases of occupational dermatitis and hand dermatitis, and a decrease of face dermatitis. Painters, personal care workers, and hairdressers were particularly affected. Sensitization in hairdressers and personal care workers (mostly cosmeticians) decreased after the peak in 2013/14, whereas sensitization to MI in painters continued to increase. Conclusions: After an unprecedented epidemic of MI allergy, mainly caused by its use in cosmetics, the continuous use of MI in industrial applications, for example, paints, and subsequent sensitization remain a matter of concern.
KW - CAS no. 2682-20-4
KW - clinical epidemiology
KW - contact sensitization
KW - face dermatitis
KW - methylisothiazolinone
KW - occupational dermatitis
KW - patch testing
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85075171248&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/cod.13414
DO - 10.1111/cod.13414
M3 - Article
C2 - 31599977
AN - SCOPUS:85075171248
SN - 0105-1873
VL - 82
SP - 87
EP - 93
JO - Contact Dermatitis
JF - Contact Dermatitis
IS - 2
ER -