TY - JOUR
T1 - The heating triangle
T2 - A quantitative review of self-heating methods for lithium-ion batteries at low temperatures
AU - Ruan, Haijun
AU - Barreras, Jorge Varela
AU - Steinhardt, Marco
AU - Jossen, Andreas
AU - Offer, Gregory J.
AU - Wu, Billy
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 The Authors
PY - 2023/10/15
Y1 - 2023/10/15
N2 - Lithium-ion batteries at low temperatures have slow recharge times alongside reduced available power and energy. Battery heating is a viable way to address this issue, and self-heating techniques are appealing due to acceptable efficiency and speed. However, there are a lack of studies quantitatively comparing self-heating methods rather than qualitatively, because of the existence of many different batteries with varied heating parameters. In this work, we review the current state-of-the-art self-heating methods and propose the heating triangle as a new quantitative indicator for comparing self-heating methods, towards identifying/developing effective heating approaches. We define the heating triangle which considers three fundamental metrics: the specific heating rate (°C·g·J−1), coefficient of performance (COP) (−), and specific temperature difference (°C·hr), enabling a quantitative assessment of self-heating methods using data reported in the literature. Our analysis demonstrates that very similar metrics are observed for the same type of self-heating method, irrespective of the study case, supporting the universality of the proposed indicator. With the comparison insights, we identify research gaps and new avenues for developing advanced self-heating methods. This work demonstrates the value of the proposed heating triangle as a standardised approach to compare heating methods and drive innovation.
AB - Lithium-ion batteries at low temperatures have slow recharge times alongside reduced available power and energy. Battery heating is a viable way to address this issue, and self-heating techniques are appealing due to acceptable efficiency and speed. However, there are a lack of studies quantitatively comparing self-heating methods rather than qualitatively, because of the existence of many different batteries with varied heating parameters. In this work, we review the current state-of-the-art self-heating methods and propose the heating triangle as a new quantitative indicator for comparing self-heating methods, towards identifying/developing effective heating approaches. We define the heating triangle which considers three fundamental metrics: the specific heating rate (°C·g·J−1), coefficient of performance (COP) (−), and specific temperature difference (°C·hr), enabling a quantitative assessment of self-heating methods using data reported in the literature. Our analysis demonstrates that very similar metrics are observed for the same type of self-heating method, irrespective of the study case, supporting the universality of the proposed indicator. With the comparison insights, we identify research gaps and new avenues for developing advanced self-heating methods. This work demonstrates the value of the proposed heating triangle as a standardised approach to compare heating methods and drive innovation.
KW - Low temperature
KW - Metrics
KW - Preheating
KW - Self-heating
KW - Thermal management
KW - lithium-ion battery
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85168835111&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2023.233484
DO - 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2023.233484
M3 - Review article
AN - SCOPUS:85168835111
SN - 0378-7753
VL - 581
JO - Journal of Power Sources
JF - Journal of Power Sources
M1 - 233484
ER -