The gap between knowledge and ability

Marc Berges, Andreas Mühling, Peter Hubwieser

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contributionpeer-review

9 Scopus citations

Abstract

We present the results of an investigation on how well students are able to understand object-oriented programming (OOP) when learning with only very minimal guidance. We analyzed the source code that the students of a preparatory course produced during the course as well as concept maps that they were asked to draw before and after the course. Our findings show, that there are observable differences between what students know about some concepts and what they're able to do with it. Generally speaking, it seems that several OOP related concepts can be applied successfully without fully understanding the underlying concepts, while others are hard to understand and apply without a significant amount of prior knowledge. This gives rise to the suspicion that it might be possible to apply a concept without having understood it, at least with respect to some algorithmic concepts of CS.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationProceedings - 12th Koli Calling International Conference on Computing Education Research, Koli Calling 2012
Pages126-134
Number of pages9
DOIs
StatePublished - 2012
Event12th Koli Calling International Conference on Computing Education Research, Koli Calling 2012 - Koli, Finland
Duration: 15 Nov 201218 Nov 2012

Publication series

NameProceedings - 12th Koli Calling International Conference on Computing Education Research, Koli Calling 2012

Conference

Conference12th Koli Calling International Conference on Computing Education Research, Koli Calling 2012
Country/TerritoryFinland
CityKoli
Period15/11/1218/11/12

Keywords

  • Cluster analysis
  • Code analysis
  • Computer science education
  • Concept maps
  • Cs1
  • Empirical study
  • Object-orientation
  • Self learning

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The gap between knowledge and ability'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this