The efficacy and safety of pregabalin in the treatment of neuropathic pain associated with chronic lumbosacral radiculopathy

Ralf Baron, Rainer Freynhagen, Thomas R. Tölle, Christian Cloutier, Teresa Leon, T. Kevin Murphy, Kem Phillips

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

138 Scopus citations

Abstract

We evaluated the efficacy of pregabalin in patients with chronic lumbosacral radiculopathy. This randomized, controlled, withdrawal trial included five phases: screening (4-18 days); run-in (4-10 days) to screen out placebo responders; single-blind (28 days) to identify pregabalin responders; double-blind to randomize responders to pregabalin or placebo (35 days); and final study medication taper (7 days). The primary endpoint was time to loss of response (LOR) during the double-blind phase (≥1-point increase in pain, discontinuation, or rescue-medication use). In the single-blind phase, 58% of patients had ≥30% pain reduction. In the double-blind phase, pregabalin (n = 110) and placebo (n = 107) groups did not differ significantly in time to LOR. Adverse events caused the discontinuation of 9.9% and 5.6% of pregabalin-treated and placebo-treated patients, respectively. Most patients with chronic lumbosacral radiculopathy responded to pregabalin therapy; however, time to LOR did not significantly differ between pregabalin and placebo. Considering the results of all phases of the study, it is difficult to draw definitive conclusions from it, suggesting a need for further work to understand the clinical potential of pregabalin treatment for lumbosacral radiculopathy.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)420-427
Number of pages8
JournalPain
Volume150
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2010

Keywords

  • Clinical trial
  • Lumbosacral radiculopathy
  • Neuropathic pain
  • Pregabalin

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The efficacy and safety of pregabalin in the treatment of neuropathic pain associated with chronic lumbosacral radiculopathy'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this