The effects of implant position, design and wear on the range of motion after total hip arthroplasty

Keyphrases

• Abduction 20%
• Acetabular Component 20%
• Acetabular Cup 20%
• Active Patient 20%
• Antetorsion 20%
• Anteversion Angle 20%
• Artificial Joint 20%
• Bearing Couple 20%
• CAD Simulation 20%
• Center of Rotation 20%
• Ceramic Cup 40%
• Component Wear 20%
• Cup Position 20%
• Design Aspects 20%
• Design Features 20%
• Dislocation 60%
• Femoral Head 60%
• Flexion 60%
• Geometric Size 20%
• Head Circumference 20%
• Impingement 40%
• Implant Design 100%
• Implant Position 100%
• Implant Wear 100%
• Inclination Angle 40%
• Joint Movement 20%
• Liner 20%
• Low Wear 20%
• Material Failure 20%
• Penetration Depth 20%
• Penetration Rate 20%
• Physiologic Range 20%
• Polyethylene 40%
• Positioning Accuracy 20%
• Range Limits 20%
• Range of Motion 100%
• Rim Fracture 20%
• Subluxation 20%
• Three-dimensional CAD 20%
• Total Hip Arthroplasty 100%
• Total Hip Prosthesis 40%
• Wear Features 20%
• Wear Rate 20%
• Young Patients 20%

Engineering

• Artificial Joint 50%
• Bearing Wear 50%
• Computer Aided Design 50%
• Design Aspect 50%
• Design Feature 50%
• Design Position 100%
• Hip Prosthesis 100%
• Inclination Angle 100%
• Joints (Structural Components) 50%

Material Science

• Lining 50%
• Polyethylene 100%