TY - GEN
T1 - The double sphere camera model
AU - Usenko, Vladyslav
AU - Demmel, Nikolaus
AU - Cremers, Daniel
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 IEEE.
PY - 2018/10/12
Y1 - 2018/10/12
N2 - Vision-based motion estimation and 3D reconstruction, which have numerous applications (e.g., autonomous driving, navigation systems for airborne devices and augmented reality) are receiving significant research attention. To increase the accuracy and robustness, several researchers have recently demonstrated the benefit of using large field-of-view cameras for such applications. In this paper, we provide an extensive review of existing models for large field-of-view cameras. For each model we provide projection and unprojection functions and the subspace of points that result in valid projection. Then, we propose the Double Sphere camera model that well fits with large field-of-view lenses, is computationally inexpensive and has a closed-form inverse. We evaluate the model using a calibration dataset with several different lenses and compare the models using the metrics that are relevant for Visual Odometry, i.e., reprojection error, as well as computation time for projection and unprojection functions and their Jacobians. We also provide qualitative results and discuss the performance of all models.
AB - Vision-based motion estimation and 3D reconstruction, which have numerous applications (e.g., autonomous driving, navigation systems for airborne devices and augmented reality) are receiving significant research attention. To increase the accuracy and robustness, several researchers have recently demonstrated the benefit of using large field-of-view cameras for such applications. In this paper, we provide an extensive review of existing models for large field-of-view cameras. For each model we provide projection and unprojection functions and the subspace of points that result in valid projection. Then, we propose the Double Sphere camera model that well fits with large field-of-view lenses, is computationally inexpensive and has a closed-form inverse. We evaluate the model using a calibration dataset with several different lenses and compare the models using the metrics that are relevant for Visual Odometry, i.e., reprojection error, as well as computation time for projection and unprojection functions and their Jacobians. We also provide qualitative results and discuss the performance of all models.
KW - Camera
KW - Model
KW - Projection
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85056788535&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1109/3DV.2018.00069
DO - 10.1109/3DV.2018.00069
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:85056788535
T3 - Proceedings - 2018 International Conference on 3D Vision, 3DV 2018
SP - 552
EP - 560
BT - Proceedings - 2018 International Conference on 3D Vision, 3DV 2018
PB - Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.
T2 - 6th International Conference on 3D Vision, 3DV 2018
Y2 - 5 September 2018 through 8 September 2018
ER -