Abstract
After giving a rich data basis of our impact tests with standardized crash-test dummies in Part I of this work we address in Part II various aspects related to these tests in a case based discussion. The presented facts, the knowledge gained from our previous work, and the data from Part I lead us to recommendations for standardized crash-testing procedures in robotics. The proposed impact procedures will help to compare blunt robot-human impacts on a common basis. We will discuss additional requirements which will enhance the completeness of testing procedures.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | 2009 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, ICRA '09 |
| Pages | 280-287 |
| Number of pages | 8 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 2009 |
| Externally published | Yes |
| Event | 2009 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, ICRA '09 - Kobe, Japan Duration: 12 May 2009 → 17 May 2009 |
Publication series
| Name | Proceedings - IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation |
|---|---|
| ISSN (Print) | 1050-4729 |
Conference
| Conference | 2009 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, ICRA '09 |
|---|---|
| Country/Territory | Japan |
| City | Kobe |
| Period | 12/05/09 → 17/05/09 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'The "DLR crash report": Towards a standard crash-testing protocol for robot safety - Part II: Discussions'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver