Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

The Development of a Rapid Review Planning Template for Educational Researchers

  • Technical University of Munich

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

Research evidence syntheses offer rigorous methodology for integrated overviews of scientific knowledge on specific topics. Yet high-quality meta-analyses and systematic reviews often take years to complete. Rapid reviews are an evidence synthesis, gaining popularity in medical contexts, with adaptable methodology emphasizing stakeholder involvement and time sensitivity. By accelerating some processes, rapid reviews are particularly useful for emerging research topics or technologies, offering stakeholders relevant, up-to-date information. Given these benefits, this method is likely to expand into education. Methodologists recommend adhering to high transparency standards, since evidence on the effects of streamlining processes is still limited; but guidelines are already emerging in the medical context. While some standards may be applicable for educational research, the variability and context sensitivity inherent in education also need consideration. Accordingly, this Research Spotlight presents the development of a rapid review planning template for educational researchers, that emphasizes possibilities for stakeholder involvement and flexibility for transparent methodological processes.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)86-92
Number of pages7
JournalZeitschrift fur Psychologie / Journal of Psychology
Volume233
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Apr 2025

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 16 - Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
    SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions

Keywords

  • educational research
  • rapid review
  • research planning
  • research synthesis
  • stakeholder involvement

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The Development of a Rapid Review Planning Template for Educational Researchers'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this