TEACHING STATISTICS WITH POSITIVE ORIENTATIONS BUT LIMITED KNOWLEDGE? TEACHERS’ PROFESSIONAL COMPETENCE IN STATISTICS

Sarah Huber, Frank Reinhold, Andreas Obersteiner, Kristina Reiss

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Research suggests teachers have positive motivational and emotional orientations regarding statistics but little statistical knowledge. How does this fit together? Since teachers’ professional competence in statistics has not been well explored, we asked 88 in-service mathematics teachers about their orientations regarding teaching statistics and tested their statistical content knowledge. First, we investigated how “positive” their orientations were by comparing them to their orientations regarding teaching fractions. Then, we analyzed relationships between teachers’ orientations and content knowledge in statistics using mixed-effects logistic regression models. The results showed that teachers’ orientations regarding teaching statistics were: (1) poorer than those regarding teaching fractions and (2) related to their statistical knowledge. Teachers with high self-efficacy showed higher knowledge than teachers with low self-efficacy, and anxious female teachers had higher knowledge than less anxious female teachers. We also found that knowledge decreased with increasing age of the teachers. The findings underscore the need to strengthen statistics in teacher education, including both content knowledge and the development of positive orientations.

Original languageEnglish
Article number2
JournalStatistics Education Research Journal
Volume23
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 2024

Keywords

  • Content knowledge
  • In-service teachers
  • Motivational and emotional orientations
  • Professional competence
  • Statistics education research
  • Teacher education

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'TEACHING STATISTICS WITH POSITIVE ORIENTATIONS BUT LIMITED KNOWLEDGE? TEACHERS’ PROFESSIONAL COMPETENCE IN STATISTICS'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this