TY - JOUR
T1 - Taking actors' preferences and the institutional setting seriously
T2 - The EU common fisheries policy
AU - Da Conceição-Heldt, Eugénia
PY - 2006/12
Y1 - 2006/12
N2 - The recent bifurcation of European studies into state-centric and new institutionalist camps has resulted in a sterile theoretical debate that says little about an empirical world where bargaining outcomes cover both member states' preferences and the institutional setting. This article is an attempt to move beyond the theoretical debate. It juxtaposes a conceptual framework for analyzing EU negotiations with an analysis of the bargaining process on the settlement of the European Union's Common Fisheries Policy. The conceptual framework will identify a set of variables that can explain the bargaining outcome: preferences of national government representatives, preferences of the European Commission, and the institutional setting.
AB - The recent bifurcation of European studies into state-centric and new institutionalist camps has resulted in a sterile theoretical debate that says little about an empirical world where bargaining outcomes cover both member states' preferences and the institutional setting. This article is an attempt to move beyond the theoretical debate. It juxtaposes a conceptual framework for analyzing EU negotiations with an analysis of the bargaining process on the settlement of the European Union's Common Fisheries Policy. The conceptual framework will identify a set of variables that can explain the bargaining outcome: preferences of national government representatives, preferences of the European Commission, and the institutional setting.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33750441878&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1017/S0143814X06000572
DO - 10.1017/S0143814X06000572
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:33750441878
SN - 0143-814X
VL - 26
SP - 279
EP - 299
JO - Journal of Public Policy
JF - Journal of Public Policy
IS - 3
ER -