TY - JOUR
T1 - Tailoring the Use of Central Pancreatectomy Through Prediction Models for Major Morbidity and Postoperative Diabetes
T2 - International Retrospective Multicenter Study
AU - European Consortium on Minimally Invasive Pancreatic Surgery and the International Consortium on Minimally Invasive Pancreatic Surgery
AU - van Bodegraven, Eduard Antonie
AU - Lof, Sanne
AU - Jones, Leia
AU - Aussilhou, Béatrice
AU - Yong, Gao
AU - Jishu, Wei
AU - Klotz, Rosa
AU - Rocha-Castellanos, Dario Missael
AU - Matsumato, Ippei
AU - de Ponthaud, Charles
AU - Tanaka, Kimitaka
AU - Biesel, Esther
AU - Kauffmann, Emmanuele
AU - Dumitrascu, Traian
AU - Nagakawa, Yuichi
AU - Martí-Cruchaga, Pablo
AU - Roeyen, Geert
AU - Zerbi, Alessandro
AU - Goetz, Mara
AU - de Meijer, Vincent E.
AU - Pessaux, Patrick
AU - Ignatavicius, Povilas
AU - Demir, Ihsan Ekin
AU - Giuffrida, Mario
AU - Tingstedt, Bobby
AU - Marino, Marco Vito
AU - Mastoridis, Sotiris
AU - Brunner, Maximilian
AU - Mora-Oliver, Isabel
AU - Bortolato, Cecilia
AU - Gulla, Aisté
AU - Apers, Thomas
AU - Hermand, Hélène
AU - Mitsuka, Yusuke
AU - Popescu, Irinel
AU - Boggi, Ugo
AU - Wittel, Uwe
AU - Hirano, Satoshi
AU - Gaujoux, Sébastien
AU - Kamei, Keiko
AU - Fernández-Del Castillo, Carlos
AU - Hackert, Thilo
AU - Kuirong, Jiang
AU - Yi, Miao
AU - Sauvanet, Alain
AU - Besselink, Marc
AU - Abu Hilal, Mohammad
AU - Dokmak, Safi
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.
PY - 2024/12/1
Y1 - 2024/12/1
N2 - OBJECTIVE: To develop a prediction model for major morbidity and endocrine dysfunction after central pancreatectomy (CP) which could help in tailoring the use of this procedure. BACKGROUND: CP is a parenchyma-sparing alternative to distal pancreatectomy for symptomatic benign and premalignant tumors in the body and neck of the pancreas CP lowers the risk of new-onset diabetes and exocrine pancreatic insufficiency compared with distal pancreatectomy but it is thought to increase the risk of short-term complications, including postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF). METHODS: International multicenter retrospective cohort study including patients from 51 centers in 19 countries (2010-2021). The primary endpoint was major morbidity. Secondary endpoints included POPF grade B/C, endocrine dysfunction, and the use of pancreatic enzymes. Two risk models were designed for major morbidity and endocrine dysfunction utilizing multivariable logistic regression and internal and external validation. RESULTS: A total of 838 patients after CP were included [301 (36%) minimally invasive] and major morbidity occurred in 248 (30%) patients, POPF B/C in 365 (44%), and 30-day mortality in 4 (1%). Endocrine dysfunction in 91 patients (11%) and use of pancreatic enzymes in 108 (12%). The risk model for major morbidity included male sex, age, Body Mass Index, and American Society of Anesthesiologists score ≥3. The model performed acceptably with an area under the curve of 0.72 (CI: 0.68-0.76). The risk model for endocrine dysfunction included higher Body Mass Index and male sex and performed well [area under the curve: 0.83 (CI: 0.77-0.89)]. CONCLUSIONS: The proposed risk models help in tailoring the use of CP in patients with symptomatic benign and premalignant lesions in the body and neck of the pancreas (readily available through www.pancreascalculator.com ).
AB - OBJECTIVE: To develop a prediction model for major morbidity and endocrine dysfunction after central pancreatectomy (CP) which could help in tailoring the use of this procedure. BACKGROUND: CP is a parenchyma-sparing alternative to distal pancreatectomy for symptomatic benign and premalignant tumors in the body and neck of the pancreas CP lowers the risk of new-onset diabetes and exocrine pancreatic insufficiency compared with distal pancreatectomy but it is thought to increase the risk of short-term complications, including postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF). METHODS: International multicenter retrospective cohort study including patients from 51 centers in 19 countries (2010-2021). The primary endpoint was major morbidity. Secondary endpoints included POPF grade B/C, endocrine dysfunction, and the use of pancreatic enzymes. Two risk models were designed for major morbidity and endocrine dysfunction utilizing multivariable logistic regression and internal and external validation. RESULTS: A total of 838 patients after CP were included [301 (36%) minimally invasive] and major morbidity occurred in 248 (30%) patients, POPF B/C in 365 (44%), and 30-day mortality in 4 (1%). Endocrine dysfunction in 91 patients (11%) and use of pancreatic enzymes in 108 (12%). The risk model for major morbidity included male sex, age, Body Mass Index, and American Society of Anesthesiologists score ≥3. The model performed acceptably with an area under the curve of 0.72 (CI: 0.68-0.76). The risk model for endocrine dysfunction included higher Body Mass Index and male sex and performed well [area under the curve: 0.83 (CI: 0.77-0.89)]. CONCLUSIONS: The proposed risk models help in tailoring the use of CP in patients with symptomatic benign and premalignant lesions in the body and neck of the pancreas (readily available through www.pancreascalculator.com ).
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85197191590&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/SLA.0000000000006157
DO - 10.1097/SLA.0000000000006157
M3 - Article
C2 - 38073561
AN - SCOPUS:85197191590
SN - 0003-4932
VL - 280
SP - 993
EP - 998
JO - Annals of Surgery
JF - Annals of Surgery
IS - 6
ER -