TY - JOUR
T1 - Switching from reservoir to matrix systems for the transdermal delivery of fentanyl
T2 - A prospective, multicenter pilot study in outpatients with chronic pain
AU - Freynhagen, Rainer
AU - Von Giesen, Hans Jürgen
AU - Busche, Peter
AU - Sabatowski, Rainer
AU - Konrad, Christhoph
AU - Grond, Stefan
PY - 2005/9
Y1 - 2005/9
N2 - Matrix systems for transdermal fentanyl will replace the reservoir systems in Europe. In an industry-independent, prospective, multicenter pilot study, 46 outpatients with chronic pain were asked to assess pain intensity, sleep interference, adverse events, and multiple secondary parameters during administration of the last reservoir and the first two matrix patches. There was no difference in pain intensity, sleep interference, and the rate of adverse events between both systems. Self assessment on a 6-step numeric rating scale (1 = very good, 6 = insufficient) comparing the two systems (reservoir vs. matrix) showed that skin compatibility (2.6 vs. 1.5), adhesive properties (3.2 vs. 1.8), wearability/comfort (2.8 vs. 1.5), and general satisfaction (2.5 vs. 1.8) improved significantly with the new matrix technology. At study endpoint, 91% of patients preferred the matrix system for future use. The new fentanyl matrix system is characterized by a high level of general satisfaction, ease of use, patient acceptance, and improved skin compatibility. Reservoir and matrix systems appear to have comparable efficacy and safety so that outpatients can be switched directly from the reservoir to the matrix system without difficulties and new dose titration.
AB - Matrix systems for transdermal fentanyl will replace the reservoir systems in Europe. In an industry-independent, prospective, multicenter pilot study, 46 outpatients with chronic pain were asked to assess pain intensity, sleep interference, adverse events, and multiple secondary parameters during administration of the last reservoir and the first two matrix patches. There was no difference in pain intensity, sleep interference, and the rate of adverse events between both systems. Self assessment on a 6-step numeric rating scale (1 = very good, 6 = insufficient) comparing the two systems (reservoir vs. matrix) showed that skin compatibility (2.6 vs. 1.5), adhesive properties (3.2 vs. 1.8), wearability/comfort (2.8 vs. 1.5), and general satisfaction (2.5 vs. 1.8) improved significantly with the new matrix technology. At study endpoint, 91% of patients preferred the matrix system for future use. The new fentanyl matrix system is characterized by a high level of general satisfaction, ease of use, patient acceptance, and improved skin compatibility. Reservoir and matrix systems appear to have comparable efficacy and safety so that outpatients can be switched directly from the reservoir to the matrix system without difficulties and new dose titration.
KW - Chronic pain
KW - Fentanyl
KW - Matrix
KW - Opioid side effects
KW - Reservoir
KW - Transdermal therapeutic systems
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=25144437097&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2005.03.015
DO - 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2005.03.015
M3 - Short survey
C2 - 16183013
AN - SCOPUS:25144437097
SN - 0885-3924
VL - 30
SP - 289
EP - 297
JO - Journal of Pain and Symptom Management
JF - Journal of Pain and Symptom Management
IS - 3
ER -