Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Switching from Dupilumab to Upadacitinib in Adults and Adolescents with Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis and Inadequate Response to Dupilumab: Efficacy and Safety Results from the Phase 3b/4 LEVEL UP Study

  • Christopher G. Bunick
  • , Nina Magnolo
  • , Angela Moore
  • , Gao Xinghua
  • , Charles Lynde
  • , Nadia Ibrahim
  • , Ayman Grada
  • , Gweneth Levy
  • , Brian Calimlim
  • , Xiaoqiang Wu
  • , Yolanda Armendariz
  • , Kilian Eyerich
  • Yale University
  • Universitätsklinikum Münster
  • Baylor University Medical Center at Dallas
  • Arlington Research Center
  • Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University
  • Lynde Institute for Dermatology & Lynderm Research Inc
  • AbbVie
  • Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

2 Scopus citations

Abstract

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic skin disease characterized by intense itch and eczematous skin lesions. Upadacitinib (UPA), a selective oral Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor, and dupilumab (DUPI), a monoclonal antibody targeting interleukin-4 and interleukin-13 signaling, are both approved treatments for moderate-to-severe AD. LEVEL UP is a phase 3b/4 efficacy assessor blinded monotherapy study comparing UPA to DUPI for treatment of moderate-to-severe AD in adults and adolescents over a 16-week period (Period 1). Patients not achieving ≥75% improvement in the Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI 75) from baseline at Week 16 entered an additional 16-week extension phase (Period 2). In Period 2, patients either continued/escalated to UPA 30 mg (UPA/UPA 30) or switched from DUPI to UPA 15 mg (DUPI/UPA), with the potential to escalate to 30 mg based on clinical response. Efficacy for skin and itch outcomes in Period 2 were assessed using observed case analysis while on treatment, without statistical comparisons. Here we report efficacy and safety results for the DUPI/UPA switch group. A total of 355 patients who did not achieve EASI 75 at Week 16 entered Period 2 of the study (DUPI/UPA, N=208). At Week 32, response rates in the DUPI/UPA group were: 79.6%, 58.7%, and 19.9% achieving EASI 75, EASI 90, and EASI 100, respectively; 60.2% achieving WP-NRS improvement ≥4 among those with baseline WP-NRS ≥4; 37.0% achieving WP-NRS 0/1 among those with baseline WP-NRS >1; and 26.8% simultaneously achieving EASI 90 and WP-NRS 0/1 by Week 32. Clinically meaningful outcomes were also observed at an earlier visit (Week 20). No new safety signals through Week 32 were identified compared to the established safety profile of UPA. Most patients with an inadequate response to DUPI at Week 16 experienced clinically meaningful improvements in skin clearance and itch at 4 weeks post-switch to UPA, with additional patients achieving these outcomes by 16 weeks post-switch. These findings suggest that switching from DUPI to UPA is an effective treatment strategy for patients who do not meet moderate or optimal treatment targets with DUPI.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)s451
JournalSKIN: Journal of Cutaneous Medicine
Volume8
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2024
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Atopic Dermatitis
  • dupilumab
  • upadacitinib

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Switching from Dupilumab to Upadacitinib in Adults and Adolescents with Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis and Inadequate Response to Dupilumab: Efficacy and Safety Results from the Phase 3b/4 LEVEL UP Study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this