TY - JOUR
T1 - Sustainability reporting and transitory environmental sustainability risks in manufacturing
AU - Schneider, Daniel
AU - Schüler, Alexander
AU - Woerle, Markus
AU - Schneider, Dominik
AU - Eisold, Niklas
AU - Reinhart, Gunther
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
PY - 2025
Y1 - 2025
N2 - This study critically examines sustainability reporting within Germany’s mechanical and plant engineering sector, focusing on the alignment with European Sustainability Reporting Standards (ESRS) and the disclosure of essential environmental metrics. Through a methodical assessment of 329 companies statistically representative for the sector, the research uncovers significant variations in reporting practices and a general shortfall in meeting ESRS requirements, especially in key environmental aspects. Methodologically, the research integrated a thorough analysis of public sustainability reports alongside a direct collection of data to evaluate the scope and depth of reporting. The findings reveal that while some companies are actively engaging in comprehensive sustainability reporting, a majority display considerable gaps, particularly in disclosing critical environmental information. This study highlights the need for enhanced transparency and robust reporting mechanisms to address and mitigate transitory environmental risks faced by the sector. By bridging these reporting gaps, companies could better align with regulatory expectations and stakeholder demands, thus safeguarding their operational viability and competitive edge in an increasingly regulated market. The insights gained underscore the challenges companies face in adapting to stringent sustainability standards, emphasising the strategic necessity of proactive engagement in sustainability reporting practices.
AB - This study critically examines sustainability reporting within Germany’s mechanical and plant engineering sector, focusing on the alignment with European Sustainability Reporting Standards (ESRS) and the disclosure of essential environmental metrics. Through a methodical assessment of 329 companies statistically representative for the sector, the research uncovers significant variations in reporting practices and a general shortfall in meeting ESRS requirements, especially in key environmental aspects. Methodologically, the research integrated a thorough analysis of public sustainability reports alongside a direct collection of data to evaluate the scope and depth of reporting. The findings reveal that while some companies are actively engaging in comprehensive sustainability reporting, a majority display considerable gaps, particularly in disclosing critical environmental information. This study highlights the need for enhanced transparency and robust reporting mechanisms to address and mitigate transitory environmental risks faced by the sector. By bridging these reporting gaps, companies could better align with regulatory expectations and stakeholder demands, thus safeguarding their operational viability and competitive edge in an increasingly regulated market. The insights gained underscore the challenges companies face in adapting to stringent sustainability standards, emphasising the strategic necessity of proactive engagement in sustainability reporting practices.
KW - climate risk
KW - Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD)
KW - small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs)
KW - Sustainability disclosure
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85216938496&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/19397038.2025.2461565
DO - 10.1080/19397038.2025.2461565
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85216938496
SN - 1939-7038
VL - 18
JO - International Journal of Sustainable Engineering
JF - International Journal of Sustainable Engineering
IS - 1
M1 - 2461565
ER -