[68Ga]pentixafor for CXCR4 imaging in a PC-3 prostate cancer xenograft model - comparison with [18F]FDG PET/CT, MRI and ex vivo receptor expression

  • Sarah M. Schwarzenböck
  • , Jan Stenzel
  • , Thomas Otto
  • , Heike V. Helldorff
  • , Carina Bergner
  • , Jens Kurth
  • , Stefan Polei
  • , Tobias Lindner
  • , Romina Rauer
  • , Alexander Hohn
  • , Oliver W. Hakenberg
  • , Hans J. Wester
  • , Brigitte Vollmar
  • , Bernd J. Krause

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

4 Scopus citations

Abstract

Purpose: The aim was to characterize the properties of [68Ga]Pentixafor as tracer for prostate cancer imaging in a PC-3 prostate cancer xenograft mouse model and to investigate its correlation with [18F]FDG PET/CT, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and ex vivo analyses. Methods: Static [68Ga]Pentixafor and [18F]FDG PET as well as morphological/ diffusion weighted MRI and 1H MR spectroscopy was performed. Imaging data were correlated with ex vivo biodistribution and CXCR4 expression in PC-3 tumors (immunohistochemistry (IHC), mRNA analysis). Flow cytometry was performed for evaluation of localization of CXCR4 receptors (in vitro PC-3 cell experiments). Results: Tumor uptake of [68Ga]Pentixafor was significantly lower compared to [18F]FDG. Ex vivo CXCR4 mRNA expression of tumors was shown by PCR. Only faint tumor CXCR4 expression was shown by IHC (immuno reactive score of 3). Accordingly, flow cytometry of PC-3 cells revealed only a faint signal, cell membrane permeabilisation showed a slight signal increase. There was no significant correlation of [68Ga]Pentixafor tumor uptake and ex vivo receptor expression. Spectroscopy showed typical spectra of prostate cancer. Conclusion: PC-3 tumor uptake of [68Ga]Pentixafor was existent but lower compared to [18F]FDG. No significant correlation of ex vivo tumor CXCR4 receptor expression and [68Ga]Pentixafor tumor uptake was shown. CXCR4 receptor expression on the surface of PC-3 cells was existent but rather low possibly explaining the limited [68Ga]Pentixafor tumor uptake; receptor localization in the interior of PC-3 cells is presumable as shown by cell membrane permeabilisation. Further studies are necessary to define the role of [68Ga]Pentixafor in prostate cancer imaging.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)95606-95619
Number of pages14
JournalOncotarget
Volume8
Issue number56
DOIs
StatePublished - 2017

Keywords

  • CXCR4
  • MRI
  • Prostate cancer
  • Small animal PET/CT
  • [Ga]Pentixafor

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of '[68Ga]pentixafor for CXCR4 imaging in a PC-3 prostate cancer xenograft model - comparison with [18F]FDG PET/CT, MRI and ex vivo receptor expression'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this