[111In]DOTATOC as a dosimetric substitute for kidney dosimetry during [90Y]DOTATOC therapy: Results and evaluation of a combined gamma camera/probe approach

Alexander Stahl, Sylvia Schachoff, Ambros Beer, Anna Winter, Hans Jürgen Wester, Klemens Scheidhauer, Markus Schwaiger, Ingo Wolf

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

4 Scopus citations

Abstract

Purpose: During [90Y]DOTATOC therapy, for determination of kidney doses a conventional approach using co-injected [111In]DOTATOC was evaluated for validity, reliability and reproducibility as well as for the influence of methodological variations and bremsstrahlung. Biologically effective doses were estimated by calculating the relative effectiveness (RE) of kidney doses. Methods: Fractionated [90Y]DOTATOC therapy (n=20 patients, 3.1±0.7 GBq/therapy cycle, 45 therapy cycles) included co-injection of 157±37 MBq [111In]DOTATOC and a nephroprotective infusion regimen. From serial gamma camera/probe measurements, individual region of interest (ROI) sets were established and kidney doses were determined according to MIRDOSE3 (corrected for individual kidney mass) by use of three methodological variants: (1) correction for interfering organs (liver/spleen) and background activity, (2) correction for interfering organs alone and (3) no corrections. A phantom study was performed with 111 In alone and with 111In +90Y to estimate the influence of 90Y bremsstrahlung. Results: Mean kidney dose (method 1, n=20 patients, 20 therapy cycles) was 1.51±0.60 Gy/GBq [90Y]DOTATOC (1.41±0.48 Gy/GBq for n=20 patients, 45 therapy cycles). With partial correction (method 2) or no correction (method 3) for interfering activity, kidney doses increased significantly, to 2.71±1.26 Gy/GBq and 3.15±1.22 Gy/GBq, respectively. The span of REs ranged from 1.02 to 1.24. Inter-observer variability was as high as ±32% (±2SD). 90Y bremsstrahlung accounted for a 4-11% underestimation of obtained target activity. Conclusion: The obtained kidney doses are highly influenced by methodological variations. Full correction for interfering activity clearly underestimates kidney doses. By comparison, 90Y bremsstrahlung and variability in the relative effectiveness of kidney doses cause minor bias. Inter-observer variability must be considered when interpreting kidney doses.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1328-1336
Number of pages9
JournalEuropean Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging
Volume33
Issue number11
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2006
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Kidney dosimetry
  • Peptide receptor-mediated radionuclide therapy
  • Radiation nephropathy
  • [Y]DOTATOC

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of '[111In]DOTATOC as a dosimetric substitute for kidney dosimetry during [90Y]DOTATOC therapy: Results and evaluation of a combined gamma camera/probe approach'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this